Frankie
Well-known member
redluv":1zq3wsly said:I've been doing some research on AM for my Animal Breeding paper, and this is kind of a summary of what I've read:sooknortex":1zq3wsly said:On a side note, do you mean to tell me that Gardiner's never had any of these problems in their herd? What happened to those animals? Were they submitted for tests?
If Gardiners had been up front years ago, a lot of this could have probably been avoided.
I just find it too incredible to believe that with their breeding program they never had these problem calves years ago. Precision is over 20 years old isn't he? They must be the luckiest people alive to have had all these recessive gene problems and never have had an affected calf.
Oh maybe now they are submitting but what about 8-10 years ago when these funny calves came out?
Gardiners' had an AM calf in the early 1990s and took it to Kansas State University to get it tested (the geneticist said it could be AM but wasn't likely). After that they raised 27,000 or some huge number of calves, and of those, they had 11-or something around that- that had the same defect as the 1st. The vets and researchers at the time said it could be environmental or disease related. Then when the 50 or whatever calves that got reported to the AAA in 2008 got the ball rolling to see whether or not it was genetically related.
Thanks for this info. I knew the Gardiners are too smart to think problems like this can be swept under the rug. They're a third generation Angus operation with the fourth generation already coming along. Commercial bull buyers know they'll be there to take care of them if they have a problem with their purchases.