HDRider
Well-known member
I am going to miss old Tom...M5farm":2o0tzeto said:Here is a little info as to why they need more money.
"The CDC isn't much better at husbanding its resources. A few years ago, it dumped $106 million into a swanky visitors' center in Atlanta, even though it already had one. It bought $10 million worth of furniture for its lavish new headquarters and spent $1.7 million to advise Hollywood on medical plots. Yes, the federal government has blown it on Ebola. But that's not because the relevant agencies have too little money to spend. - See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer ... myUtP.dpuf"
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer ... heir-waste
The CDC, for example, was busted in 2007 by Oklahoma Republican U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn's office for a litany of questionable spending decisions.
Among them: spending $1.75 million over seven years on a "Hollywood liaison" whose job was to help movie and television studios develop accurate plot lines about diseases. To pay the position, the CDC tapped into an account that was supposed to be used to develop responses to bio-terrorism.
Making matters worse, the head of the Hollywood liaison office was found to be a former CDC employee who landed in one of the cushiest semi-retirements ever dreamed up by the federal government.
That spending might have brought more scripted realism to House, Grey's Anatomy and General Hospital, but it didn't do squat to help combat Ebola or any other real world disease.
http://watchdog.org/177212/cdc-nih-ebola-budget/