Campground Cattle":11pz3r9i said:Frankie":11pz3r9i said:Texan":11pz3r9i said:So, I guess some of you guys don't think its important to have traceback capabilities?
I think it's important and I think it's going to happen. If Bruno wants to withhold his cattle, that's his right. I'm happy to identify my cattle and there are thousands of other cattlemen who are willing to. I don't think it's all going to happen this next year, but sooner than later, we're going to have a traceback system here in place in the US. Some feedlots are already willing to pay more for sourced cattle. CAB's "natural" beef program all comes from cattle with the Angus Source ear tag. IMO, somewhere down the line you'll either be raising beef or dog food. It's a food safety issue that COOL first brought to the forefront and the mad cow made even more important.
Frankie I have to agree with Caustic on this one we have too much big brother anyway I have no problem with a voluntary program. Everything the government sticks their finger in turns FUBAR.
I prefer a voluntary program and think that's where we're headed. Those who choose to identify their cattle will benefit. IMO, those who choose NOT to identify their cattle will find their market restricted. I've seen several proposals, some sale barns will put the tags in before they're run through the ring, one group has a vet qualified to put them in and affirm that the cattle are born locally, etc. My state cattleman's assn is working hard on this and I have confidence that they're looking out for my best interests.