Hook
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
- Messages
- 2,923
- Reaction score
- 2
Again, I see this as an over reaction.
Hook":2gnwxamj said:Again, I see this as an over reaction.
in that case you have some issues. Another wonderful thing about this country is one can still voice their opinion, comrade greybeardgreybeard":22vgxlm7 said:Hook":22vgxlm7 said:Again, I see this as an over reaction.
Actually, I scaled it back from what I actually think of that kind of selfish attitude.
Do I need to ask the question in different terms or can you answer it as it is currently stated?
What gives you the "right" or "freedom" to think you can disregard what has always been determined to be "constitutional"??? You're rights and freedoms are not unlimited and never have been !!! And in reference to your question "dam right I'd take the ebola vaccine". Just about any medicine or vaccine you take comes with warnings. Hook you're exactly like this guy in Dallas that is currently in critical condition. He was willing to do whatever it took to get back to the US, knowing he had been exposed but also knowing he had a better chance of survival over here. He was willing to lie to all authorities about everything just to get back over here. He had NO CONCERN for anyone else or what might be the longterm effect of his bringing this disease to our country. As long as you can get it "your way" you don't give a dam about anyone else. :!: :!:Hook":yu4ba1k0 said:Ok, I'll play along.
If by choosing not to vaccinate, and the event of an outbreak, they endanger anyone beyond themselves, at that point they should be placed under mandatory quarantine.
What gives anyone the right in this country to mandate vaccination, which if you are on the losing end of the lottery, could lead to death or serious complication? Who are you to tell anyone they have to vacc or else? Last I checked this still isn't Russia comrade
Hook":jt5ypukx said:How am I like the Dallas Ebola guy tb? That's a reach. Simply because I feel it should be a choice? You're arguing a hypothetical, there isn't an Ebola vacc.
Again, if there was an outbreak of a disease that there is a vacc for, it wouldn't be difficult to force a mandatory quarantine for those not vaccinated. I guarantee each person not vacc is known to each health department of each state or county in this country.
The nbc camera guy and the NBC doctor and crew went to Liberia knowing Ebola was there. The camera guy got infected. Now the rest of them are in quarantine. Calculated risks.
What's next, ridicule someone for not gettin the flu shot? The flu kills a shyt load of people every year. Don't hear anyone here getting all pizzy about that. Make it mandatory. Right? :bang:
Hook":2xxe1av3 said:Ok, I'll play along.
If by choosing not to vaccinate, and the event of an outbreak, they endanger anyone beyond themselves, at that point they should be placed under mandatory quarantine.
What gives anyone the right in this country to mandate vaccination, which if you are on the losing end of the lottery, could lead to death or serious complication? Who are you to tell anyone they have to vacc or else? Last I checked this still isn't Russia comrade
Hook":2ya585mt said:No
Only if the constitution is shyt on. Mandated medical care for the entire populous. Pure socialism
If there is an outbreak