boondocks":2f11fi7k said:
Caustic Burno":2f11fi7k said:
Had they chosen not to sell firearms at all they are well within their rights.
They carved out a segment of society that can legally own the firearm.
Waiting on your legal citation for this proposition....Gotta have some consistency here; are businesses allowed to restrict sales (of cakes, guns, widgets) based on their own sense of morality, or is there a higher duty to the consuming public?
They have the right to not sale at all .
They do not have the right to violate one's constitutional right that is legal by state and federal law.
Their decision to not sell was not based on a first amendment right to override someone's second amendment right.
You either believe in the constitution or not. It was written to protect us from this very type of tyranny.
Madison was responsible for the first due to persecution of Baptist and Methodist ministers being in prisoned for their beliefs. He was neither by the way.