vclavin":2q70ozuu said:
VanC,
Thanks for the info, I was wondering if CAB were the only ones that didn't actually "spell out" what breeds were allowed to be included in their speciality beef. Looks like CHB is guilty as well?
Valerie
Yes, they're guilty as well, but not as guilty as Angus.
An animal with a black hide could have very little Angus influence. On the other hand, an animal with a white face likely has at least 1/4 Hereford in it. The white face doesn't stick around as long as a black hide can. Sure, the white face could come from the original type Fleckvieh Simmental but 1: I doubt if there are too many of them being run through US packing plants anymore and 2: the Hereford branded beef programs specifically rule out obvious continental influence. That said, since many of the obvious differences between breeds have been obscured in the past 30 years or so, there's little doubt that some animals with continental breeding make it through into the Hereford programs. How often is anybody's guess.
Here's a site I found listing all the USDA branded beef programs and the live animal and carcass requirements:
http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fet ... acct=lsstd
The only ones that are breed specific are Angus, Hereford, Wagyu, Akaushi, and Texas Longhorn, therefore they're the only ones that list any live animal requirements. Of those five, it appears, at least to me, that Angus is the least breed specific of the five. But remember, as Robert and I have pointed out, when CAB started out a black-hided beef animal meant Angus. Not that way anymore, but that has nothing to do with anything that the Angus people have done.