Let's get this straight once and for all, FSW, so that the Cattle Today board members here understand about the Simmental and Simangus. There are two sectors within Simmental:
the Performance Sector and the
Show Sector. My analogy, though harsh, is just to better differentiate between the two for better understanding.
The Performance Sector are the breeders that take all the data. We are the members of the Total Herd Enrollment (THE) Program, Carcass Merit Program (CMP); we send our bulls to test stations; we collect the data on CE, BW, WW, YW, MCE, MWW, MM, DOC, YG, Marb, BF, Shr, API, TI, Scrotal, Hip Heights, Ultrasound, frame scores, etc. and this is where the EPD's and Indices are derived from.
The Show Sector are the breeders that put in little or usually no data in the system. They are not members of Total Herd Enrollment (THE), they don't support the Carcass Merit Program (CMP); they don't put bulls in state Bull test stations and they are usually the first ones to tell you that EPD's are not worth anything. Even though they do not collect any data they use the data.
My analogy for this is the
Tax Payer and the
Welfare Recipient.
The Tax Payer, being the members of the
Performance Sector;
add to the till in the form of data collection. We are the ones that provide all the information for the EPD's and Indices.
We have been propping up the Show Sector for decades as they utilize and benefit from the data we collect. It's just like the tax payer paying the way for the welfare recipient.
The Performance Sector is more commercially focused as we think that any breed association that is not commercially focused would be a dying breed. We are the Tax Payers providing for the Welfare Recips.
The Welfare Recipient, being the members of the
Show Sector;
add nothing to the till, yet benefit from those who do all the work. They are the first ones to tell you that you should base your quality assessments on Phenotype. They are the ones who have been able to stay in business by keeping the misinformed and/or ill-informed buyer in the dark on EPD's and Indices. These are the people raising show cattle that have no supporting data of any quality parameters,
because they do not input any data –
their data is derived from the Performance Sector.
Surely not every single person on these boards is driven by the
Show sector. I don't know a single cattle buyer that has ever asked me if I had an ex-show bull or heifer that was a shoe box with legs available. Not once.
It's fine with me if you want to buy a bull or cow based on phenotype alone, if you like the shoe box with legs or you feel that EPD's and Indices are worth very little, however, I did want you to know what has been going on in the Simmental and Simangus business for a very long time.
It is simple -
if you need a bull that is more commercially focused (real data) you should be buying one from a member of the
Performance Sector.
If you are deep into the show circuit and your management begins and ends with a feed bucket – then a bull from the
Show Sector would work just fine for you.
Fire Sweep Ranch":1kqnvod8 said:
Yet you are wrong. Here is her registration link:
https://herdbook.org/simmapp/action/ani ... er=2894560
All I had to do was a quick search of her tattoo number, the ASA herd book is a wonderful tool to search all kinds of information on breeders and animals alike.
Looks pretty good EPD wise, but I have seen both these heifers in person and they are better than they were pictured. We saw them unclipped and in their natural state. They are NOT show heifers, but the guy who raises them does not claim to raise show cattle. They have not been fed hard. We have seen his weaning weights and paycheck from the sale barn on his calves sold at the barn in December. They are made genetically easy going, as evidence of the rest of the cows at that place. The proof is not in the EPD, but the ACTUAL weight those calves weighed when they walked across the scale at 30 days post weaning. EPDs are a tool we use in our tool box, and I'll take what I see as more proof than a number on a sheet of paper.
Mr. Davis, your quick attack on other breeders yet touting you have the "top EPD" cattle does not bode well with others. I did a quick search last night on the database of the ASA, and there are red cattle that are percentage and purebred that have a higher API than your girl you pointed out.
Go ahead and get on your soap box of rightessness, but I bet you are turning more people off your from buying your genetics than driving customers into your facility.