El_Putzo":1lbzyaz6 said:1848":1lbzyaz6 said:I would not hesitate to purchase the 517 semen, although I would probably not put him in heifers. I would take and use the semen in a flush and increase my chances of conceptions to him, or place him in good milking cows that I know will produce a good bull. That way, you can continue to inject the 517 bull and his high accuracies, into one of your better cow lines on the maternal side.
How does flushing work? I've heard it's expensive.
El_Putzo":fhm1sj3n said:1848":fhm1sj3n said:One more note. Remember Frank Felton basically had a closed herd with the exception of his bulls which he marketed very well. The Feltons line is sometimes best used like an outcross due to this fact, and is much of the reason his bulls did so well. None of his females were being released and this prevented the simular matings that Frank was capable of producing, but it did make his stacked genetics excell when placed in other programs with different genetic bases. So do you want to flood you bloodlines with 517 on both sides (ie World Class x 517) for the sake of high accuracy, or do you want excellerated growth through the heterosis of using 517 as an outcross.
To answer those last two questions..... yes and yes.
I think I would like to "flood the bloodlines" with Feltons to get some great maternal brood stock then when I get my herd built up, cross them up with lines like Victor and Remitall to get that extra poundage. I think the Feltons style bulls that come along here first should make just as good of bulls as when I finally get to cross with the other bloodlines.
I wasn't sure if that would be wise to breed my heifers to World Class and then put the offspring back on 517. Would that be too close to in-breeding? I have heard it's ok as long as you don't cross dad to daughter or mom to son, or brother to sister. As long as you keep one generation of separation it shouldn't hurt, is this right?
mtnman":y43s3axy said:What are the minuses of 517? I see his REA is below average, but do they look thick when alive?
How are udders, teats, and feet on the 517's?
mtnman
El_Putzo":1aqr1wwn said:Anybody know a way to look into the future 4 years so I can see what my 517 calves will look like as yearlings???
certherfbeef":3cwblhv4 said:El_Putzo":3cwblhv4 said:Anybody know a way to look into the future 4 years so I can see what my 517 calves will look like as yearlings???
This might give you an idea of a 517 yearling:
[/img]
And how bout a 5yr old 242 daughter:
[/img]
certherfbeef":2yoleo0a said:James,
It appears to me that you have gotten some good advice here. The only thing I will say is that if you ever decide to flush...check around and talk to an embroyologist. In my experience, most vets cannot get it done.
If I'm going to sink that much money into something, I want it done correctly. Now, 1848 probably has an excellent and qualified vet that does his flushing. That is great! But around here, we go to an embroylogist. Just my opinion though. Have fun, enjoy your cattle!!!!