Bcompton53
Well-known member
Brute 23 said:Bcompton53 said:Brute 23 said:The 6.5C has less recoil the the 270 by far. I despise the 270 because of the recoil. If I was in the market for a 270 type gun I would go 280 with out a doubt. Less recoil and better ballistics. 264 Mag is the same way but the ammo is not quite as common.
Only good thing about the 6.5C is people are jumping ship on them for hunting rounds so there are some cheap one popping up on forums already.
Two guys showed up withs 6.5s this year in WTX. Both lost deer and put them back in the truck for their 308s.
I go back and forth between my 243 and 308. I generally take both when I go any where. In deep STX or WTX where the deer get pretty large I favor the 308 but have not had an issue with either. I have the suppressor on the 243 which is a lot of fun and hard to beat.
I have the same tripod. We use it for sighting in or hunting out of pop up blinds.
If you're saying the 6.5cm isn't adequate for those little Texas deer, I think you're crazy. I've shot hogs, Kansas whitetails, and elk with the 6.5 and it's killed every one.theres never a perfect caliber or the best caliber. There's only compromises between energy, b.c., sectional density, velocity And recoil. Kill a deer with a shoulder mounted howitzer if you want.
I'm not saying that. It's just not the miracle caliber ther enet suggests. It's a fad like the 300 black out. Soon they will move on to the next re-marketed caliber.
Fortunately I think the 6.5 is here to stay. Way too many companies invested deeply at this point. I agree on the 300blackout....I hear guys say, well it's perfect for subsonic rounds, which I guess is a thing. Don't want zombies to hear you shoot, ya know