KMacGinley":25k6vcm3 said:
I also usually avoid this argument, but the use of the word meaningless was unfortunate. Integrity is never meaningless, the people that are upset with CAB are mainly upset because they see it as false advertising, all CAB is not angus or even angus genetics.
They could solve this easily by insisting on this in the standards instead of the disingenous Black hided criteria.
Ever been to a large slaughter plant and seen the people working on the floor? They may be experts on dissasembling carcasses, but I doubt many of them know beans about breed charactoristics.
If someone were to call Bill O'Reilly and point this out, the ballgame would be over. I think the Angus Assoc. should change this on their own, before that does happen.
It is not really about the beef, it is about selling Bulls to commercial guys as has been pointed out many times on here.
I am an angus breeder by the way, and I think the program needs to be honest for all involved.
Yes, it is meaningless when the purpose of the issue is simply to stir up a pot of argument for the sake of argument. Those whose hearts are really into shutting down CAB should spend their time complaining to Montel Williams or maybe Jerry Springer.
Does CAB spell out their program on their website? Yep. Is their enough room on a beef label to do the same? Nope. I suppose they could hand out a brochure on every piece of meat sold, explaining what the criteria were for the branding. People would still buy it. By the tons :lol: I'd like nothing more than to see non-angus meat tossed out of the program. Have packers buy only from certified angus breeders (tested annually) and let the price drive up to pay for it all and pay the producers even a higher premium at the same time.
Let the others form a label called "Black Cow Meat".
Now, next time you go buy a John Deere I hope you jump up and down because he didn't tell you that the engine was made in Mexico when your pre-conceived notion was that it was a fine American made product.