CreekAngus said:
Branded: I was told that by three different guys, two of them run far more cattle that Branded or Creek and have progeny on the ground. The third guy owns a Semen company, I was the fourth guy in the conversation. And that was a direct quote from one of the ranchers,"If you can't run them out west you shouldn't run them anywhere".....that was said by a guy who sells over 100 bulls a year, after heavy culling and this year not a single Colonel made the sale. Does that work as a fact? I'm not a fan of Protocol, I've seen a lot of his progeny and the bull himself up front and personal, but I am a fan of Cory, grew 20 miles from me and is a legit cowboy. And Branded: once again you took far more out of post than you should have, no one trashed any operations.
Colonel is not a producer of bad feet.
I've got a list of bulls to stay away from when it comes to foot issues, and he's definitely not on it.
Isn't Spruce Mountain out west? They own a part interest in Colonel, right?
Many times what I have found in the Angus business, is that the friendly smile and handshake is anything but, people become very jealous, and they say whatever it takes to disparage an animal. I'm not saying that you did this because you were basically going on rumor.
The Angus business is about to release a foot score EPD, which will be the new category that many seed stock producers will work hard to get towards the very top. Good feet are priceless, right up there with milk and longevity. You know that. I'm sure Hoover Dam will rank very high on that EPD, and transmit that into his progeny.
Y69 doesn't have foot issues, what she does have is 147 DNA proven progeny on the ground, not too shabby. Hoover Dam, which is Colonel's grandsire has 3600+ DNA proven progeny on the ground. There is a lot of data behind Colonel. I'm not saying problems can't surface, but he is no mystery bull, with a shady background.
You are basically calling out the entire Baldridge operation, along with the owners of Colonel, who I'm pretty sure aren't novices in the Angus business, at least not judging from the animals they produce. If Baldridge can't produce a decent animal for the hardcore western rancher, then maybe you all need to switch to mules to handle the territory.
The whole "it's tougher in the west" narrative might be true, but winter in Kentucky is no walk in the park, deep mud, and months upon months of rain or snow, or both at the same time will test an animal, and test them hard. Ever seen cattle when they are covered in ice? as in it rained, then went down below freezing, so their coats are soaked with a layer of ice across their back, and they are standing in a foot of mud? This destroys feet quickly, and only the strong survive. I'm sure this happens elsewhere, but in Kentucky, it's the norm.
You may think I'm upset when I reply, but I'm just clearing the air, nothing personal at all. If I wanted to I could flip the switch and start multiplying my herd quickly to the point where I'm one of the largest if not the largest registered Angus producers in Kentucky. Right now, we are well above the average registered operation in size. Let me just say, we have the ability to expand, by multiples. Instead of saying "we run a large number of Angus, therefore we are the authority" I would much rather say, we focus on quality over quantity. Of the three different guys you mentioned along with the owner of a semen company, how many would be open for a close look at their herd's overall stats? I mean from a genomic enhanced EPD standpoint? How many of those three are enrolled in Maternal Plus and watch their herd obsessively trying to improve every epd category on every animal. My hunch, none of them, it takes too much time, and of course money. I understand. Can't keep a cow open until you get the animal you want, got to stay on a breeding window, if AI doesn't get her, then the "cleanup bull" takes over. There are a lot of cleanup bull progeny that have all-stars on the registration. A person around here pulls that nonsense. I promise if his entire herd was tested with DNA, that you would see that the dots don't connect, but it's like I've said before to one of my clients, if you buy a fake Rolex on the streets of NYC and you think it's a real Rolex, that's all that matters to some people, their happy. Let's just say that some unsuspecting commercial folks that do not have an AAA membership, nor do they DNA test their bulls, are proud owners of a "fake Rolex" if you know what I mean.
I've not seen photos of these bad feet, nor of the progeny that were culled, I don't even know if they were Colonel's progeny. Look at the Rainfall debacle. Those culled "Colonels" might have actually been "Sergeants" or even "Privates", who knows? Lot's can go wrong on big herds, there is a lot to watch out for, things can slip by, and when they aren't DNA tested, it's anyone's guess who the Daddy is contributing those bad feet.
DNA testing every single animal in a herd, especially a large herd, can become burdensome, and costly, especially when it involves many generations back. I understand, but it's the only way of letting your client know with 100% certainty what they are buying is the real deal. None of this matters at all in the commercial business, but in registered herds you owe it to yourself and your clients to test for everything.