HerefordSire
Well-known member
Do you prefer cattle that are longer or thicker all other things being equal?
to be a purebred breeder you need to think like a commercial cattleman, what they want,,,, "pounds"HerefordSire":2tcsppex said:Do you prefer cattle that are longer or thicker all other things being equal?
alacattleman":3q61z0vz said:to be a purebred breeder you need to think like a commercial cattleman, what they want,,,, "pounds"HerefordSire":3q61z0vz said:Do you prefer cattle that are longer or thicker all other things being equal?
why do they dock for larger frame later maturing calves give me a moderate framed meaty calve that will finish out quicker,HerefordSire":1isjg2ny said:alacattleman":1isjg2ny said:to be a purebred breeder you need to think like a commercial cattleman, what they want,,,, "pounds"HerefordSire":1isjg2ny said:Do you prefer cattle that are longer or thicker all other things being equal?
You think thick cattle weight more?
You think there is more meat on long cattle that weigh the same as thick cattle?
:cowboy:angus9259":2dxfgy8z said:well, the subject header should get quite a few hits anyway
angus9259":cug6l8sc said:well, the subject header should get quite a few hits anyway
alacattleman":21i4uzte said:most longer body ive seen tend too be pencil gutted with no depth, out of proportion
ok,,, i no longer give a damHerefordSire":3tsexrso said:alacattleman":3tsexrso said:most longer body ive seen tend too be pencil gutted with no depth, out of proportion
Most longer ones that I have seen weigh more than the thicker ones. I would rather eat a steak from a long one than a thick one.
HerefordSire":3qjeh5qe said:alacattleman":3qjeh5qe said:most longer body ive seen tend too be pencil gutted with no depth, out of proportion
Most longer ones that I have seen weigh more than the thicker ones. I would rather eat a steak from a long one than a thick one.
Longer does not equal larger frame.
Willow Springs":yqjx9lkj said:Longer does not equal larger frame.
Are you sure? They are very highly correlated.
I tend to agree with your second statement with several exceptions.
Willow Springs":1h1k2v5i said:I tend to agree with your second statement with several exceptions.
Are these exceptions based on actual stelekal mesurements (hide, muscle, fat off), or visual appraisal? The later lacks a lot of validity. Even live animal measurements are somewhat flawed.
In answer to your first question; I like a balance, so I wouldn't take either. Too much one way or the other can render the animal non-functinal without excess human intervention. We don't get paid enough for any intervention.
I would be interested in some butchers conducting a scientific test.
Willow Springs":eyrbazg1 said:I would be interested in some butchers conducting a scientific test.
I had a professor in university that did just that. He grew up being taught to judge cattle like most of us did. By the time he had his doctorate he realized a lot of what we had been selecting for was simply our eyes playing tricks with us. He had done visual animal appraisal and cut-outs and realized that the bones were all proportional to each other. A longer bodied animal is generally a larger framed animal. Depth of body (generally created by larger internal organs, more gut fill, internal fat, external fat) and body condition can make an animal appear shorter bodied. An animal is a physical being, which means that it functions according to the laws of physics. If everything is not in the right balance the animal ceases to function at an optimal level. As producers we can create an environment for that animal to produce, but it isn't profitable in todays global market.