greybeard
Well-known member
off topic but Things sure have changed.....first calf I ever had was a registered Angus heifer--about 8 months old. $375 and my father thought that was an outrageous price--1966.
Retaining heifers in a terminal commercial operation has loser written all over it.poorfarmer":w3bpkgi3 said:I would point out that mashing the scales doesn't mean a whole lot if efficiency isn't there or for some who retain ownership throughout have to consider other things such as how they will grade. And just out of curiosity how many of you who think papers on heifers are worthless, buy registered bulls
talltimber":1uoqlgf4 said:Caustic Burno":1uoqlgf4 said:Caustic Burno":1uoqlgf4 said:True I will give you a roll of toilet paper with every one of my heifers.
Paper doesn't mash scales and means nothing to to me as stated.
FIFY. I might should have not capitalized LOT, but I do have an interest in that info. But I guess I don't qualify as commercial cowman, since mine are not registered and all. I have a neighbor that couldn't care less about knowing how his cows are bred, but he gets most of his at the sale barn. Not a lot of info there normally, and wouldn't matter if there was. But he also don't cut, doubt he vaccinates/worms, doesn't care if he has two calves that matches out of 75. But, he's still in business, so he's doing something right. There are a number of commercial guys here buying purebred cows and putting registered bulls on them so they know what they have. Those seem to be the ones that looks like they have a cookie cutter calf maker, and that's what I am trying to do. Even five head that match will get a few more cents a pound here it seems.
u4411clb":1xgkfl0u said:talltimber":1xgkfl0u said:
FIFY. I might should have not capitalized LOT, but I do have an interest in that info. But I guess I don't qualify as commercial cowman, since mine are not registered and all. I have a neighbor that couldn't care less about knowing how his cows are bred, but he gets most of his at the sale barn. Not a lot of info there normally, and wouldn't matter if there was. But he also don't cut, doubt he vaccinates/worms, doesn't care if he has two calves that matches out of 75. But, he's still in business, so he's doing something right. There are a number of commercial guys here buying purebred cows and putting registered bulls on them so they know what they have. Those seem to be the ones that looks like they have a cookie cutter calf maker, and that's what I am trying to do. Even five head that match will get a few more cents a pound here it seems.
Not needing papers is not the same thing as not knowing what breed or even the lines of your cattle. A commercial guy may want to purchase a heifer that is from a Brangus momma and Horned Hereford bull and that may be all he purchases. Are there any papers for a cow like that not that I am aware of but you can't beat her as a momma cow.
I myself prefer heifers from a Gert momma and a Horned Hereford bull. That is what I am starting to use and I have no papers but I know what is in my cows and how they should perform on my place. So my point is not needing registered cows does not neccessarily mean you are running mongrel cows either.
Every study I have seen has said that cross bred momma cows produce more pounds and for a longer period of time. I have no idea why a commercial guy would want registered cows anyway unless he is making his own replacements like we do as well. But as far as going in the commercial operation no thanks give me a good commercial girl everytime and her papers make a good napkin.
u4411clb":eys1on0t said:Yes the Gert mommas and the Hereford bulls that my cows come off of are registered stock. Have I ever seen the papers from the Gert mommas no I haven't and have no desire too. I am sure there is some way to combine the epd numbers from the AHA and SGBI associations but I have never gave it any thought. I do use the eye test and I do not like to choose the top 10% as far as biggest or the fastest growing when choosing replacements to purchase as I have found those heifers don't seem to stick around as long. I have found if you pick structurally sound heifers that are the right size for their age and you can look at their parents I can make about as good a decision for my operation as looking at epd's.
And from that I use trial and error to weed out the ones that stick around and the ones that grow wheels. You have to remember epds are just an expectation a fancy word for guess. You can go through epds with a fine tooth comb and still have to cull a certain number of replacements. Pick the ones that breed back and calf without issue and raise a calf every year and get rid of the rest and you will be ok on the commercial side imo.
To be honest and I know most will disagree with me. I look at feet and confirmation along with disposition and some guess as how they perform on fescue pastures as my main criteria in picking heifers. If they have that and are the right size for their age that is what I have found works for me.
Now as far as my Angus bulls I do go over the epd's because I have found that is what buyers want to here from me. I can spit out there YW epd's and $B and $F. And I have found that buyers at least in my area want to know the info on the bulls used and that the calves are at least verifiable 50% angus and no more than a 1/4 Brahman and they are happy. They would prefer some continental but I haven't found a way to make that work for me.
I also do have a small herd of registered Gert mommas and a Reg hereford bull. I did not even keep the papers on the Gert mommas I guess they are in a desk somewhere. And on the Hereford bull I did look at his epds but he was in no way the top as far as growth epd's in his group. And I had first choice of a group of about 40 yearlings that over half were AI sired and the bull I chose was from a cleanup bull that the owner a Hereford breeder in my area for many many years had kept whose numbers didn't stack up with the Ai bulls growth wise. But this bull performed in my environment and thrived on fescue pastures more than the others and his mom was a Dam of distinction and I could not be more happy with the replacements he has given me.
EPD's are a tool and I do look at them when picking my Angus bulls to give the buyers what they want but when it comes to my female replacements I just don't have any use for them. I am not trying to create bulls for people to buy or curb benders. I am trying to create steers and heifers that go to the feedlot and perform. I will let the purebred guys do the scientific scanning and numbers and embryo transfers etc part (I don't get paid for that) and will stick to my old cowboy sense for my part.
Kingfisher":2k0xewnl said:u4411clb":2k0xewnl said:Yes the Gert mommas and the Hereford bulls that my cows come off of are registered stock. Have I ever seen the papers from the Gert mommas no I haven't and have no desire too. I am sure there is some way to combine the epd numbers from the AHA and SGBI associations but I have never gave it any thought. I do use the eye test and I do not like to choose the top 10% as far as biggest or the fastest growing when choosing replacements to purchase as I have found those heifers don't seem to stick around as long. I have found if you pick structurally sound heifers that are the right size for their age and you can look at their parents I can make about as good a decision for my operation as looking at epd's.
And from that I use trial and error to weed out the ones that stick around and the ones that grow wheels. You have to remember epds are just an expectation a fancy word for guess. You can go through epds with a fine tooth comb and still have to cull a certain number of replacements. Pick the ones that breed back and calf without issue and raise a calf every year and get rid of the rest and you will be ok on the commercial side imo.
To be honest and I know most will disagree with me. I look at feet and confirmation along with disposition and some guess as how they perform on fescue pastures as my main criteria in picking heifers. If they have that and are the right size for their age that is what I have found works for me.
Now as far as my Angus bulls I do go over the epd's because I have found that is what buyers want to here from me. I can spit out there YW epd's and $B and $F. And I have found that buyers at least in my area want to know the info on the bulls used and that the calves are at least verifiable 50% angus and no more than a 1/4 Brahman and they are happy. They would prefer some continental but I haven't found a way to make that work for me.
I also do have a small herd of registered Gert mommas and a Reg hereford bull. I did not even keep the papers on the Gert mommas I guess they are in a desk somewhere. And on the Hereford bull I did look at his epds but he was in no way the top as far as growth epd's in his group. And I had first choice of a group of about 40 yearlings that over half were AI sired and the bull I chose was from a cleanup bull that the owner a Hereford breeder in my area for many many years had kept whose numbers didn't stack up with the Ai bulls growth wise. But this bull performed in my environment and thrived on fescue pastures more than the others and his mom was a Dam of distinction and I could not be more happy with the replacements he has given me.
EPD's are a tool and I do look at them when picking my Angus bulls to give the buyers what they want but when it comes to my female replacements I just don't have any use for them. I am not trying to create bulls for people to buy or curb benders. I am trying to create steers and heifers that go to the feedlot and perform. I will let the purebred guys do the scientific scanning and numbers and embryo transfers etc part (I don't get paid for that) and will stick to my old cowboy sense for my part.
Geez how many cows are you talking about? 40 or 4oo or?