I guess I'll post my observations. The 1090 looks altogether deeper, stouter than 1036 but I think a good bit of that is the depth of stalks under him. The lack of stalks under 1036 makes him appear taller and shallower, add to that his more elevated head position and he gives the impression of being a showier, more lightweight bull, the top bull is up to nearly his hocks in stalks, this adds to the impression of depth of body, the lower head position adds a slightly more masculine appearance to the view, less showy more workmanlike. 1036 seems a tad high in the tailhead, both have much to commend them. I'd be willing to bet that side by side in the flesh you'd have a lot tougher time deciding.