Why are you grass farmers against more people eating grass-fed beef?
As for accuracy, yes there are factual errors, but then we all benefit from shady marketing such as CAB or whatever.
Where is it written that in marketing you cannot knock your competition? Seen any Ford/Chevy commercials? Why so sensitive?
As for pork, as monogastrics, they can handle corn. Cattle cannot in the doses used. That is undeniable, and that fact is becoming more widely known. There is no way to avoid the word getting out, unless you think personal attacks and distraction will work. Don't see what muslims have to do with the subject.
The feedlot system intentionally makes cattle sick, which increases the need for antibiotics. From both diet and stress. Nobody sees an ethics problem here?
As my brother said while working in a feedlot, to be a real cattleman, you need a dead pile.
I recall years ago reading this article from Feedlot Magazine about liver abscesses in feedlot cattle. Studies show abscess rates up to 40%, but with use of antibiotics, these veterinarians' goal is to keep it down to 15%. They were worried about antibiotics being banned and would then have to change practices. Anyway, consider a success if only 15% of cattle have abscesses?
http://feedlotmagazine.com/archive/arch ... ticle.html
So the whole system is designed to make animals sick, and depend on antibiotics, and we can't see why consumers have a problem? We can't see why some producers might have a problem with it?