Frankie":3kpdypnp said:
SPRINGER FARMS MURRAY GRE":3kpdypnp said:
la4angus":3kpdypnp said:
txag":3kpdypnp said:
Frankie":3kpdypnp said:
As for maternal traits, there's a reason the nation's cowherd has turned black. It's because a good Angus momma cow is hard to beat.
i won't disagree that Angus momma cows may be hard to beat, but i don't think that's the reason the cowherd has turned black.
the reason can probably still be attributed to the Angus but more to their marketing program than anything else. the cowherd has turned black to "appear" angus & ride on the coat-tails of that excellent marketing program.
I suspect that part of the answer is that a majority of the buyers own,or have interest in black cattle. Why else would their be a price difference in black and red angus unless the buyers were biased to the black hide??
The buyers who purchase cattle at the sale barns for feedlots generally have some sort of orders on what to buy and how much they should pay for them. Their "bias" for black hides is not a conspiracy. It's because Angus breeders have been testing bulls for years to produce feed efficient cattle. Cattle that will get through the feedlot quickly and then possibly qualify for the CAB premium (even though I think quality premiums are down because Japan isn't buying our beef anymore).
Frankie, I know I am on the short end of an argument with the kind of gravitas that you bring to cattle discussion, but I can't let this one pass. I am not saying that Angus breeders haven't significantly narrowed the gap, maybe even closed it in some cases, but Herefords for many years were the most efficient cattle made, and I believe they still are. I have a thick envelope of data that you challenged me to produce when I first stuck my nose in these boards. I haven't submitted it because Jack Ward failed to provide the websites etc. where you could go see for yourself, and I am still waiting for more in-depth data.
I would suggest a compromise: At this point in time, Herefords and Angus are close enough in efficiency that there is more variation between individuals than there is between the breeds. That leaves several reasons for the black craze: #1, You should be proud of the marketing job they have done; #2 Black cattle ARE troubled less by flies and pinkeye. #3 Black cattle are more easily show prepped. #4 The certified program was a masterpiece. #5 While Angus was unified with their CAB, Hereford folks were still fighting over horned and polled instead of celebrating their options.
Having made these concessions, I still say that we've made great strides on our problems; Roughsedge's 2001 study shows that Hereford bulls are the #1 heterosis cross for breeds across the board, with Gelbveigh getting the most benefit from a Hereford bull, specifically in survival to weaning, 3.49% direct. The Gelbveigh/Angus produces a 2.14% number. The reason given for this is that Herefords are more genetically different than other breeds. Given the BLACK Limis, the BLACK Simis, the BLACK Maines, the BLACK this, and the BLACK that, all of which were brought about by dipping into the fine Angus gene pool, this is no surprise. Let's be totally honest and say that Hereford bulls do stay home better as a whole as well.
I don't think anyone who has impartially eaten both Angus and Hereford beef when comparably fed and prepared from animals of comparable quality genetics is going to say that the Angus is any better.
Angus cows milk heavier as a whole; Hereford cows have a 96% conception rate versus 86% for Angus as a breed average.
All I'm saying is that Angus are not THE BEST in every category. Come on, you have 50 or 60% influence in the nation's cowherds, why begrudge the ole Hereford's 15-30%, depending on the source, moving up five or ten points?
Sorry for butting into this red/black Angus discussion everyone!