Red Bull Breeder
Well-known member
I no that i rode the short bus, ( couldn't get along bus to where i live) but i don't recall ever reading anthing about yeild grade 0. Maybe 4ctophand will explain it to me.
thats simple,,,,, its nothing ;-)Red Bull Breeder":4g0n9ugq said:I no that i rode the short bus, ( couldn't get along bus to where i live) but i don't recall ever reading anthing about yeild grade 0. Maybe 4ctophand will explain it to me.
Red Bull Breeder":1jah529w said:I no that i rode the short bus, ( couldn't get along bus to where i live) but i don't recall ever reading anthing about yeild grade 0. Maybe 4ctophand will explain it to me.
Sure I can explain it to you --- ya ever seen a Limi hanging on the rail that has zero fat covering>? Thats a goose egg; the big nill; a zero.... And there are other breeds too that quite often YG 0 --like White Park,Red Bull Breeder":ppskorn8 said:I no that i rode the short bus, ( couldn't get along bus to where i live) but i don't recall ever reading anthing about yeild grade 0. Maybe 4ctophand will explain it to me.
LoveMoo11":17mka8ls said:I would think for the YG to be absolutely zero all the components of the calculation would have to be zero, meaning NO backfat, etc. According to my animal science class this last semester the four components of YG are amount of backfat, kidney/heart/pelvic fat, area of ribeye muscle, and hot carcass weight. There's no way an animal could have NO ribeye muscle or hot carcass weight.
You are too busy in the weeds in search of anyting to prove yourself right --who cares --all the measurements calculated a 0.9 will never be a 1dyates":2bxt0lmt said:LoveMoo11":2bxt0lmt said:I would think for the YG to be absolutely zero all the components of the calculation would have to be zero, meaning NO backfat, etc. According to my animal science class this last semester the four components of YG are amount of backfat, kidney/heart/pelvic fat, area of ribeye muscle, and hot carcass weight. There's no way an animal could have NO ribeye muscle or hot carcass weight.
That's what Jethro said. "An ot (alt) plus an ot equals ot." :nod:
4CTophand":11juklca said:You are too busy in the weeds in search of anyting to prove yourself right --who cares --all the measurements calculated a 0.9 will never be a 1dyates":11juklca said:LoveMoo11":11juklca said:I would think for the YG to be absolutely zero all the components of the calculation would have to be zero, meaning NO backfat, etc. According to my animal science class this last semester the four components of YG are amount of backfat, kidney/heart/pelvic fat, area of ribeye muscle, and hot carcass weight. There's no way an animal could have NO ribeye muscle or hot carcass weight.
That's what Jethro said. "An ot (alt) plus an ot equals ot." :nod:
It is a ZERO. :tiphat:
4CTophand":1y0vaisv said:You are too busy in the weeds in search of anyting to prove yourself right --who cares --all the measurements calculated a 0.9 will never be a 1dyates":1y0vaisv said:LoveMoo11":1y0vaisv said:I would think for the YG to be absolutely zero all the components of the calculation would have to be zero, meaning NO backfat, etc. According to my animal science class this last semester the four components of YG are amount of backfat, kidney/heart/pelvic fat, area of ribeye muscle, and hot carcass weight. There's no way an animal could have NO ribeye muscle or hot carcass weight.
That's what Jethro said. "An ot (alt) plus an ot equals ot." :nod:
It is a ZERO. :tiphat:
Red Bull Breeder":137y0dvs said:Whole bunch of us is trying RD Sam but we just can't seem kill it.
4CTophand":pbrlaivm said:That's what Jethro said. "An ot (alt) plus an ot equals ot." :nod:[/quote
You are too busy in the weeds in search of anything to prove yourself right --who cares --all the measurements calculated a 0.9 will never be a 1
It is a ZERO. :tiphat:you are too busy in the weeds --- these cattle like Limmis they are always low on YG 0 > 0.9 > 1 all equals a dock in price--That was kind of insulting...I was trying to be helpful.
and last time i checked .9 was not zero it was .9
that is the point--- now that being said (yall need to learn to think outside the box---) how do we improve that carcass since there are some ppl that think these cattle have something to offer the industry -- which they do-- but not straight Limmi... gotta cross this breed or you lose---- lets use Angus lol
You are too busy in the weeds in search of anything to prove yourself right --who cares --all the measurements calculated a 0.9 will never be a 14CTophand":r9xlxjj8 said:That's what Jethro said. "An ot (alt) plus an ot equals ot." :nod: