sim.-ang.king
Well-known member
But glyphosate doesn't affect the plants ability to absorb sugar, or create sugar. So your glycan would be the same at the time of death, sprayed or not.
sim.-ang.king":15nv3eqi said:But glyphosate doesn't affect the plants ability to absorb sugar, or create sugar. So your glycan would be the same at the time of death, sprayed or not.
You said it yourself. It has a simple sugar (glycan) and saturates with the items that destroy cell surface sugars. The name says it all.sim.-ang.king":1hld3w82 said:It's called Glyphosate because it's made from Gly, organic compound C3,H8,N,O5, Ethylene glycol monomethyl ether, and phosphate (P).
It has a simple sugar (glycol) so you can bind the hydrocarbon (Ethylene) to the solvent, monomethyl ether, which then is combined with phosphorus.
The name has nothing to do with it's mode of action, and saying that the word "sate" stands for saturation is just a conjuring of your own imagination, and pure ignorance.
Highpoint":eaumg4cy said:You said it yourself. It has a simple sugar (glycan) and saturates with the items that destroy cell surface sugars. The name says it all.sim.-ang.king":eaumg4cy said:It's called Glyphosate because it's made from Gly, organic compound C3,H8,N,O5, Ethylene glycol monomethyl ether, and phosphate (P).
It has a simple sugar (glycol) so you can bind the hydrocarbon (Ethylene) to the solvent, monomethyl ether, which then is combined with phosphorus.
The name has nothing to do with it's mode of action, and saying that the word "sate" stands for saturation is just a conjuring of your own imagination, and pure ignorance.
Glycosylation is the enzymatic process that attaches sugars (glycans) to proteins, lipids, or other organic molecules. These attached sugars can be structural and/or functional. In their functional role, they server as antennae, interacting with cellular receptors and thus affecting cellular processes. Sugars attached to proteins (glycoproteins) server as signals in cellular communication, thus influencing processes involved in inflammation and immunological reactions.
Hope this helps
True Grit Farms":2y9yyj32 said:Facts mean nothing to liberals.
ChrisB":2op4p35q said:Kudos to you Highpoint for all the research you have done. Not saying this is the case with you, but one thing I've learned from people that are gung-ho about organic and natural foods is that they only will read the research of people they agree with. If you really want to know the truth, try to research both sides with an open mind and then draw your own conclusions. It's too bad money influences studies but I think University studies are less likely to be influenced than independent studies. If you think it is only Monsanto and companies like them paying money for desired results you are fooling yourself. There is a lot of money to be made in organic and natural foods. You think these Dr.'s giving these speeches and writing papers are only doing it to help people? They make their living pushing their ideas, you think they are going to give fair and balanced reports?
That might be ok for people who are not faced with life or death of family. The ones in organic and natural have lost their reputation and many their income which is always the case when it involves such large amounts of money. I am glad you and your family are well but if they become sick my first advice will be to get off GMO until your well again. There really is plant based medicin that works.Bright Raven":2ldsh7ct said:ChrisB":2ldsh7ct said:Kudos to you Highpoint for all the research you have done. Not saying this is the case with you, but one thing I've learned from people that are gung-ho about organic and natural foods is that they only will read the research of people they agree with. If you really want to know the truth, try to research both sides with an open mind and then draw your own conclusions. It's too bad money influences studies but I think University studies are less likely to be influenced than independent studies. If you think it is only Monsanto and companies like them paying money for desired results you are fooling yourself. There is a lot of money to be made in organic and natural foods. You think these Dr.'s giving these speeches and writing papers are only doing it to help people? They make their living pushing their ideas, you think they are going to give fair and balanced reports?
Excellent points. It permeates every aspect of society. It is a trait we all share - we seek confirmation of what we already believe.
PS: I embrace the SKEPTIC.
ChrisB":iq3in7xc said:It's too bad money influences studies but I think University studies are less likely to be influenced than independent studies. If you think it is only Monsanto and companies like them paying money for desired results you are fooling yourself. There is a lot of money to be made in organic and natural foods. You think these Dr.'s giving these speeches and writing papers are only doing it to help people? They make their living pushing their ideas, you think they are going to give fair and balanced reports?
greybeard":1mp2oz0q said:ChrisB":1mp2oz0q said:It's too bad money influences studies but I think University studies are less likely to be influenced than independent studies. If you think it is only Monsanto and companies like them paying money for desired results you are fooling yourself. There is a lot of money to be made in organic and natural foods. You think these Dr.'s giving these speeches and writing papers are only doing it to help people? They make their living pushing their ideas, you think they are going to give fair and balanced reports?
Keep in mind tho, if you remove the research grants, and private monies from universities, you have just taken a huge chunk of financial resources from that university's ability to function. They too are very very susceptible to being influenced in what and how they do their research, the findings they include in their final analysis, what they include and what they 'conveniently' exclude, and which data they include and which data they toss out as 'superfluous' outliers' or the infamous anecdotal evidence simply to arrive at a conclusion that pleases whoever is paying for the university research. Universites don't give a crap where the money comes from and are loathe to to present any findings that very much pizzoff or disappoint those who support them financially.
I learn so much in these discussions. Now I am not sure you know what you are talking about but it does tie into something else I know. Cells absorb sugars. In fact they know that if you want cancer tumors to take in a substance just feed it sugar. Yes it many times will explode the tumors but without addressing the root cause it will float into other parts of the body thus cancer everywhere. Same goes for natural substances like turmeric or frankincense. Mix them with sugar and research shows it too will explode tumors.sim.-ang.king":27zlg2v6 said:It's called Glyphosate because it's made from Gly, organic compound C3,H8,N,O5, Ethylene glycol monomethyl ether, and phosphate (P).
It has a simple sugar (glycol) so you can bind the hydrocarbon (Ethylene) to the solvent, monomethyl ether, which then is combined with phosphorus.
The name has nothing to do with it's mode of action, and saying that the word "sate" stands for saturation is just a conjuring of your own imagination, and pure ignorance.
I was never sure why glyphosate was blamed for causing cancer. It is a patented mineral chelator and a patented antibiotic and it was used for these things prior to being used as a herbicide. As a mineral chelator, it can disrupt fetal development, especially bone and tendon development. As an antibiotic that has been widely applied throughout the world, it is likely contributing to antibiotic resistant "super bugs" that cause bacterial infections. If an animal ingests glyphosate with its food, the good gut bacteria that are instrumental in digesting the food (especially in grazing animals) and that are the main component of an animal's immune system are killed. That causes weight loss and susceptibility to diseases, neither of which are good for livestock herds or wildlife.You are right about a few things here. Health issues in the USA is about to break the bank and people of all ages now have the Internet to study and some are very mad while others are just trying to make a living. The dots are not all connected yet but by the time they are it will be the large corporate groups that will loose the most unless they have found good seeds and learned how to work with natures immune system instead of trying to destroy the land and add back just what is needed to produce a crop. You mine as well not follow them down that hole. Goodness if you farm at all you can see fungus issues super weeds and instead of reducing the amounts of chemicals you are now required to increase. I can see too why no one wants to admit it has caused some serious health costs as well.
When I first started studying deep study fifteen years ago I started with the high school teaching on the immune system. The Bible says we are just dirt so what helps the dirt helps us. I went into raw milk than how in the world pharma took over universities in 1910. I found out how the Supreme Court allowed corporations to own living things like the seeds and their race to modified the seeds so farmers could not save their own. By the way it started with GE patenting a worm that was suppose to be able to eat oil. Those same companies would love to shut up Dr Huber and others as if they can keep the farmer in the dark. Please don't misunderstand, I came to this site to learn as much about cattle as possible not to change your way of doing things. I have already learned a great deal and with me I like to ask the question why. I cannot always find your language terms but will get there.
Who knows maybe one day the cattle online will add a section on organic or natural. It appears from comments that there are some involved in it.
You are right about a few things here. Health issues in the USA is about to break the bank and people of all ages now have the Internet to study and some are very mad while others are just trying to make a living. The dots are not all connected yet but by the time they are it will be the large corporate groups that will loose the most unless they have found good seeds and learned how to work with natures immune system instead of trying to destroy the land and add back just what is needed to produce a crop. You mine as well not follow them down that hole. Goodness if you farm at all you can see fungus issues super weeds and instead of reducing the amounts of chemicals you are now required to increase. I can see too why no one wants to admit it has caused some serious health costs as well.
When I first started studying deep study fifteen years ago I started with the high school teaching on the immune system. The Bible says we are just dirt so what helps the dirt helps us. I went into raw milk than how in the world pharma took over universities in 1910. I found out how the Supreme Court allowed corporations to own living things like the seeds and their race to modified the seeds so farmers could not save their own. By the way it started with GE patenting a worm that was suppose to be able to eat oil. Those same companies would love to shut up Dr Huber and others as if they can keep the farmer in the dark. Please don't misunderstand, I came to this site to learn as much about cattle as possible not to change your way of doing things. I have already learned a great deal and with me I like to ask the question why. I cannot always find your language terms but will get there.
Who knows maybe one day the cattle online will add a section on organic or natural. It appears from comments that there are some involved in it.