I find it fascinating that so many of you mask wearing vaxers are so obsessed with those of us who reject your orthodoxy.
In the highly likely event that the vaccines are fully approved by later this year, does that change your opinion of them? They've already been studied and administered far more frequently than most vaccines are at the time of approval.So coincidental deaths count when they are coincide with COVID but not when related to the vaccine? It is that constant manipulation of the numbers to suit the cause and the huge double standard that has led to the majority of resistance to begin with. Nobody trusts the information given from either side.
Also it is approved for emergency use and I believe that if you feel it is an emergency for you to get it go ahead. My hang up along with most resisting it is not in immediate effects but a lack of long term knowledge to possible side effects. To dismiss those or say they don't/won't exist you are only fooling yourself. The list of failed or pulled medications and vaccines after long term study is long. Furthermore there are reasons why we use both modified live and killed vaccines depending on the application in cattle- side effects. If you are old and/or high risk should you get it probably. Is my healthy teenage daughter getting it with her entire reproductive life ahead of her- not likely.
You flatter yourself. People can choose for themselves whether or not to be vaccinated, but they should make that decision based on sound science and professional medical advice, not propaganda from Tucker Carlson.I find it fascinating that so many of you mask wearing vaxers are so obsessed with those of us who reject your orthodoxy.
When and where did I reference Tucker?You flatter yourself. People can choose for themselves whether or not to be vaccinated, but they should make that decision based on sound science and professional medical advice, not propaganda from Tucker Carlson.
I'm just applying the same logic to the virus that you're trying to apply to the vaccine. There's no practical reason to fear the long term effects of the vaccine. The virus is just as much, if not more of an unknown.Not likely no, for that risk group there is no reason to fear the virus more than the unproven vaccine. Time is a constant that doesn't change.
Many forget (or never knew) that the first real field 'test' of the experimental Salk polio vaccine was on about 600,000 American school children in the mid 1950s.They've already been studied and administered far more frequently than most vaccines are at the time of approval.
Much more so. The vaccine and or it's side effects are not contagious, nor is there one shred of evidence that the vaccines self mutate.The virus is just as much, if not more of an unknown.
And I said if the maker guarantees 1% of vaccinated cattle will die and I know that 2% of my unvaccinated cattle will die without being vaccinated, I'd vaccinate the herd.I didn't say 2%.....i said 1%......If the vaccine maker almost guaranteed 1% would die from the vaccine versus may be 1% or possibly none...without it.
No worries, you're already 'self-vaccinated' 90% of the herd will be vaccinated, it's just a matter of if it will be by contracting covid and achieving immunity that way or by the needle.I survived it once, it'll be interesting to see if I a can survive it again.
Hi Buck,There's no practical reason to fear the long term effects of the vaccine. The virus is just as much, if not more of an unknown.
But, but, but, it's not a vaccine. Someone said it right here on CT so it has to be true.Let me emphasize one more time for the record how glad I am we had Donald J Trump in office during the early onset of this pandemic to cut the regulations and speed the availability of a vaccine.
He did a he!! of a job.
Good for you. That's a good way to not answer the question.And I said
And I said if the maker guarantees 1% of vaccinated cattle will die and I know that 2% of my unvaccinated cattle will die without being vaccinated, I'd vaccinate the herd.
its possible that Trump pushed out a vaccine in record time or they would have locked us down for years till they developed one thru normal channelsBut, but, but, it's not a vaccine. Someone said it right here on CT so it has to be true.
Now, you (and former president Trump) are saying it is a vaccine.
But I get it. If it helps a certain political affiliation, it IS a vaccine, but if it doesn't, then it's not.
Ironic tho, that Trump backers often emphasize that he was responsible for a fast vaccine development, but Trump backers also make up the core of anti vaccers. By GOP's own data, about 40% of conservatives plan on NOT getting vaccinated, even tho Trump and his wife and daughter did get vaccinated.
View attachment 4444
Indeed he did and folks like you basically nullify his efforts by refusing to take it.Let me emphasize one more time for the record how glad I am we had Donald J Trump in office during the early onset of this pandemic to cut the regulations and speed the availability of a vaccine.
He did a he!! of a job.
I can't take it, I just had the China Virus in March and the medical experts I have consulted advise strongly against being vaccinated at this time.Indeed he did and folks like you basically nullify his efforts by refusing to take it.
Amazing. Other experts advised my wife and a number of friends who had covid to go ahead and get it.I can't take it, I just had the China Virus in March and the medical experts I have consulted advise strongly against being vaccinated at this time.
I'll be happy to PM you his number and sign a release so he can tell you himself.Amazing. Other experts advised my wife and a number of friends who had covid to go ahead and get it.