I cannot find anything that says Aureomycin Crumbles are unsafe to feed to a heifer in very late gestation concerning the calf or the milk that the calf will drink. Has anyone else heard different?
Chuckie
Chuckie
Worthless for much of anything much worse than a cough.Chuckie":1255mge3 said:A heifer was here with mastitis, and I am afraid that it could have been passed through the salava, bacteria, and the other heifers may have subclinical mastitis. I would just like to treat the heifers here, to be on the safe side. After reading what it can do to the calves if they drink the milk, and all the other problems the bacteria causes for the cow, even death if it advances, it seems like it might be a cheap prevention.
Chuckie
Lucky_P":36kcurab said:I'm not buying all(and not many of) the premises 'they' put forward. Have you got a link to that article?
What does the SSC run on a tank of milk out of herd handled this way? I have to disagree with you a bit on this one. I've seen much more environmental mastitis as well as that caused by faulty equipment and employees doing a poor job.cow pollinater":1bn42og9 said:Also, since you got my brain moving... Beef cattle have been genetically culled for years for things like mastitis. A range cow won't get antibiotics if she gets severe mastitis, she just dies and her genetics are removed from the gene pool. With dairy cattle, we continue to improve on our ability to kill mastitis and save cows that should be removed from the gene pool and then perpetuate the problem by keeping females out of problem cows.
Your best bet for a healthy herd in the future is to leave them alone until it's life threatening and then treat and cull the calf later.
Those are cows that never seem to get bred back. They're milked until there isn;t drop left in them, (even though they are eating more grain to make milk then they are paying for with their production)TexasBred":1q8axtiu said:Please explain "500 day lactation" or was that a typo.
Management, management, management.....often very poor. As for milking a cow 500-600 days....can't imagine someone allowing a cow to stay in the milk string that long for any reason. I've dried off cattle giving 80 pounds because they were bred and needed their 60 day rest period before freshening.dun":1gj9868h said:I wish some of the "supposed" dairymen around here would learn to troubleshoot the equipment. When I was doing the DHIA tech deal I saw some horrendous milking practices.
Your first 3 words sums it up. But I would preceed it with P POORTexasBred":2zwhn7pe said:Management, management, management.....often very poor. As for milking a cow 500-600 days....can't imagine someone allowing a cow to stay in the milk string that long for any reason. I've dried off cattle giving 80 pounds because they were bred and needed their 60 day rest period before freshening.dun":2zwhn7pe said:I wish some of the "supposed" dairymen around here would learn to troubleshoot the equipment. When I was doing the DHIA tech deal I saw some horrendous milking practices.
cow pollinater":24944jgm said:I'll never forget an online class that I took from a big university that I won't name since overall it was a good program. A student had a registered HO cow that had some huge type score with contracts for embryos to one of the big studs (not abs ) The entire purpose of taking that class for that student was to learn how to either manage that particular cows scc to make it look better or to learn how to dry her off without effecting her reproduction so as to not jepordize her contract potential. The instructers of that particular class were happy to tell just how to "fix" her so that she could stay in service... Made me sick.