ccr said:
it's hard for me to get my head around that a fire 3500 miles south of me, 6000 miles from europe, and over 10,000 miles from china is affecting 20% of the source of oxygen for all of these places. maybe i'm not understanding the phrase 20% of the worlds oxygen.
who came up with this 20% number and what data was used to arrive at this conclusion?
on the tv news this morning most of the area that was shown was not forest, looked like cleared land.
The vastness of the Amazon is hard to fathom. It's over 2 million square miles. If it were a country, it would be the 9th largest in the world, and it is almost entirely covered in some of the densest forest on the planet. It is so dense and difficult to navigate that until very recently there were tribes living there who had never had contact with modern civilization. There may be more in there.
Given those numbers, not really hard to see how losing 25% of it could alter the atmosphere of the earth.