MikeC":133ndkmu said:Angus/Brangus":133ndkmu said:MikeC":133ndkmu said:Brute 23":133ndkmu said:Their has to be a balance. The hay people have to get what they need but the have to remember that the consumer is not getting rich off the cattle either.
The problem is too many people are starting to raise prices to take advantage of the market that is flooded with hobby farmers. They will pay what ever so they can watch the cows and horses walk around on their property not worried about profit or loss.
They out number us (people concerned with profit) so they influence the market more,,, making it harder on us. You see this with alot of products now,,, even with land.
20 yrs ago they would not have gotten away with that becuase the market was controlled by real cattle men who would have told them where to shove that hay so they could sit on it.
Consumer getting rich off cattle?
I have found that real farmers/ranchers will pay more than the hobby folks.
They actually realize how much it costs to put up hay.
The hobby folks that have never baled hay have no clue. :lol:
I agree with Brute that baling your own have gives a person more control over the quality and overall outcome of the process. Having gun to your head by some guy stashing away hay for to make a killing later is not for me.
As to the price of cattle: given the very same animal, why would a "professional" rancher pay more than a hobbyist for that animal? Doesn't make sense. I could see him/her paying more in general, simply because they have a better eye and experience.
Who said the "pro" would pay more for cattle?
My statement was directed towards hay. :roll:
I just noticed that too... :lol:
I read it fast and assumed it pertained the rest of the discussion. Maybe it was a typo.