greybeard":3tf9mszt said:
CAB helped the industry I'm sure, but CAB helped CAB more than anything else. It might guarantee a good eating experience but comes nowhere near guaranteeing the public couldn't or wouldn't have the same experience with any other breed sourced steak. The illusion that it will is exactly that--an illusion foistered upon an unsuspecting public. A very well played illusion, and at the right time, but an illusion none the less, and I am NOT saying Angus influence isn't all it's cracked up to be by CAB label. Just
saying there are also other sources that offer exactly the same or even better without the little label. Again--well played.
Ehh-well-no sense hashing over a topic that's been covered 100 times anyway. The arguments are mostly semantics anyway.
not arguing with what you stated but without a label how is the consumer to know.
it's a marketing plan that benefits the breed, beef industry and most of all the consumer in my opinion.
laura's lean is marketing as is nolan ryan branded beef, as is cab and etc.
i think the reason it works is because the consumer feels reassured that when they spend their hard earned money for a steak
that they are getting a good cut of meat opposed to a steak from an herd bull that will be tough as a boot.consumer confidence and marketing their product is all i see it to be.
i don't see anyone knocking other cattle, they are just marketing thier product.
as i stated before it has created an emphasis on carcass quality a cross the beef industry which benefits the consumer and in turn benefits the beef industry.
not trying to be a hard head but thats what i am i guess