Miss Daisy":b54gnniu said:there are may other online encyclopedias to choose from... or, oh my, you could read a book!
VanC":o0900mi8 said:Miss Daisy":o0900mi8 said:there are may other online encyclopedias to choose from... or, oh my, you could read a book!
Get real! Next you'll be asking people to do math without a calculator. ;-)
Alice":3llk7uou said:VanC":3llk7uou said:Miss Daisy":3llk7uou said:there are may other online encyclopedias to choose from... or, oh my, you could read a book!
Get real! Next you'll be asking people to do math without a calculator. ;-)
:shock: Yikes! Now, that would be bogus!
Alice
Hippie Rancher":3rezncsm said:never anything incorrect in a hard copy, published, source either is there? :roll:
VanC":2clw7e11 said:I wasn't aware that anyone could modify Wikipedia. I will look at it differently from now on. Thanks for the heads up, Alice.
On a side note, it's just another warning that we need to take any information on the internet with a grain of salt. It's a fantastic thing to have all that information at our fingertips, but unfortunately much of it it false, biased, and harmful.
cmjust0":20cgr52n said:For instance, it states that the biggest difference between the 9/2N and the 8N is that they went from a 3-spd to a 4-spd transmission, totally omitting the fact that the 8N also introduced "position control" to the three-point lift.. Before that, the lift was either all-up, or all-down -- wouldn't hold a spot in between.
Can you imagine if your tractor's lift was only all-up or all-down?? I can't.. That said, it seems to me that the introduction of position control -- to the world -- is probably more important than having gone from a 3-spd to a 4-spd...
Alice":268833jv said:Hippie Rancher":268833jv said:never anything incorrect in a hard copy, published, source either is there? :roll:
Good point...however, it's a little hard to modify/edit a hard copy, published source and put it back on the shelf in a matter of minutes...
Alice