Lammie":20jr39uy said:Looks like a pain in the butt row crop to me.
Lammie":2wruypfn said:With cigs at over six a pack, I quit again.
lakeportfarms":22q09r3s said:I say tabloid newspaper/magazines like the Enquirer, Star, etc...
larryshoat":1b2r7blh said:Naturaly I'm for taxing anything that I don't use, but as Margaret Thatcher said "the problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of everybody else"s money" ( that's paraphrase, I don't have the exact quote) .
Larry
Lammie":2bluqbry said:Looks like a pain in the butt row crop to me.
My favorite newspaper, the "Weekly World News" quit publishing a year or two back. Website is not near as good. Here's T-Boone with some alternative energy options:HerefordSire":1qqvjop3 said:lakeportfarms":1qqvjop3 said:I say tabloid newspaper/magazines like the Enquirer, Star, etc...
Newspaper companies are dropping like flies because of free online news. Wouldn't you know it the last ones standing are likely to be the less reputable ones and the same ones staring at (poor) people in the checkout isle of the local supermarket with a catchy front page.
VanC":ddwok4vr said:Speaking of taxes, I think its time we explore the possibility of a flat tax again.
Question: " I understand that Congress is considering a so-called 'flat' tax system. How would this work?" Answer: "If Congress were to pass a 'flat' tax, you'd simply pay a fixed percentage of your income, and you wouldn't have to fill out any complicated forms, and there would be no loopholes for politically connected groups, and normal people would actually understand the tax laws, and giant talking broccoli stalks would come around and mow your lawn for free, because Congress is NOT going to pass a flat tax, you pathetic fool." ~Dave Barry
Never mind.
grannysoo":x8s5dxpt said:A consumption tax on all products. When you do this, you will bring the underground economy into the tax system. The underground economy is probably as large as the regular economy.
I saw the other day where the #1 cash crop in California was marijuana. A consumption tax would get the tax money when those dollars were spent.
However, if you don't want to do this and only tax one item: tax television viewing. :lol2:
Jogeephus said:I don't know how they figure that. Seems awefully low if you look at the numbers. I had just figured it in my head using some rough figures but I wasn't in my think tank. However, I went to my think tank and sat down and smoked it over using a little sharper mind and here is how I figure it.
The terrible big carbon foot-printed farmer in the US produces tobacco and jobs for the industry. The industry uses 1.6 billion pounds of domestic tobacco per year and inports nearly a quarter billion pounds. This creates lots of private industry jobs - which as we all know is a bad thing due to environmental reasons. This greedy farmer is rolling in money since he gets to pocket about $2.40/lb. or $0.04/pack. Of course, he has to hire lots of help and buy lots of equipment, fertilizer and fuel to produce such a windfall profit - but I'm sure his banker gives him a break every chance they get. Since it takes about 1.9 lbs of tobacco to make a 1000 cigarettes this works out to roughly 2.63 cartons per pound of tobacco. Or roughly, 53 packs per pound.
Placing a $0.62 a pack fed sales tax on top of the existing $0.39/ pack sales tax would equal $1.01 /pack. But you also get to add the new state tax which is going to be $1.00/pack which should bring the total near $2.01/pack. Things get a bit muddy here and but there is also a state $0.255 /pack sin tax on the federal taxes or maybe this could also be assessed on the combined excise taxes which would add another $0.50 per pack which brings the total to $2.51/pack. But then the county can add their own excise tax if they choose. On top of this add the sales tax of say 7% which brings the taxes on a pack to around $2.73/pack which is a pretty good return for your investment. ($144/lb taxes)
Since I don't have the figures on hand, I'm just going to guess that about half of this stays here and is used for cigarettes. If this is the case then there should be about $144 billion for us to fund our pet projects and such. So undoubtedly, if the 30 billion figure is correct we must only use 10% of our crop and export the rest. With 90% export market this again is a reason we should definitely crack down on it. Afterall, just think of how bad we must be polluting the oceans. Maybe this is just the money ear-marked for the children's health programs this is supposed to fund and the rest of it will go to dolphin research and woodpecker relocation programs. You know, the important stuff. Don't know. Don't really care. What is important is that we build a larger government. I think this whole idea is utterly fantastic. I mean, when we crimminalize tobacco users while at the same time decrimminalizing the use of marijuana it will only be a matter of time before we can employ the same system on weed. Fantastic idea. I guess the tax on the weed could go to subsidize all the jailers this will put out of business and maybe be serve as the seed money for a new Homeland Ecological Defense Agency.
HS, per your request, attached is a picture of my 'think tank design'.
What is next? Guns and ammunition?
backhoeboogie":i6cixy83 said:Lammie":i6cixy83 said:Looks like a pain in the butt row crop to me.
Just don't sell any of it or you'll be in big time trouble. There are only 4 states that can legally sell commercially grown tobacco. The native Americans have been fighting this for years because some want to commercially grow it in other states.
john250":ysp40cja said:Lammie":ysp40cja said:Looks like a pain in the butt row crop to me.
Or a cure for AIDS.
http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbc ... 9904050401
Jogeephus":jdewh32p said:We used to work convicts. We had all sorts but I remember one guy in particular cause he was a cigarette smuggler like Backhoe. They locked him up for going to the Carolinas and buying cheap cigarettes by the case and loading them in his car and selling these "non-taxed" items in Georgia. I forgot how many years he was serving but it was a good stint of hard labor for cutting our glorious state out of its share of the cigarette tax. I was always real careful around him cause he was so "dangerous". (I always wondered this, but assuming he was doing 7 years, how much do you think it cost our state to protect us from this villain.) Whatever the cost, I'm sure it was worth every penny.