ollie?":2qyjntmz said:
I think I read on their site CRR that 17,000 scientists (2000 of them related to this field) had signed the petition.) Because you are a farmer, is your observation more valid than their data?
We already hashed this over in the earlier thread. But, it you insist......
If you would have read your own source more carefully, you would have noticed that the petition had more to do with the political upshot of global warming (criticism of the Kyoto Protocol) than it does with anything else. The petition does nothing to assess the supposed "data" that you mention.
Among the many flaws on that petition, the most telling is that there are a minuscule number of climatologist signatures. Many of the signatures are bogus, and those that do come from scientists generally come from researchers whose field is not climatology.
Do a little digging and find out who funds the OISM.
So, ollie, now we've learned that you don't believe in:
1. Evolution - a foundational theory of biology
2. Plate tectonics - a foundational theory of geology
3. Anthropogenic global warming - the clear, current consensus
Any other "stupid theories" you'd like to debunk with your vast scientific knowledge?
Gravity?
Thermodynamics?
Spherical Planet?