************* said:
sim.-ang.king said:
So how many of your steers pencil out?
Good points.
Something else that is just as important as the genetics of dam and sire, is the nutritional content of what is available for grazing. I enjoy reading your posts Branded. I also admire your passion and the amount of time and resources you have invested in your program. Here is the fly in my ointment. I live smack dab in row crop country. Consequently, the ground used here for pasture is either sand knobs or low ground. Neither one known for fantastic vegetative productivity; else, it'd be in corn or beans :roll:
I have slowly been changing my herd to more efficiently utilize this ground. (I am a small time pipsqueak with 25-35 cows on 125 acres pasture/hayfields). At one time I ran mostly angus and sim-angus cross cattle. They struggled to maintain condition and wean heavy calfs without supplementation in my environment/management style. I have been adding Hereford dams to replace those ciws as we cull for age or other issues. Was using a Connealy bull on those Herefords and making some decent crosses. The Herefords seem to hold up better in this environment; maintain better BCS, better wean wts, tolerate harsh winters better. How would you expect one of your bulls to perform as an integral part of a crossbreeding based program with Herefords; making F1 females and steers to a local feed lot?
Thank you for what you said. I read your post carefully and here are my thoughts. I like Connealy genetics, especially Capitalist. I think you would benefit from high $EN and DMI sires, problem is those traits tend to deliver calves on the light side.
As for Hereford versus Angus, they are both great beef cattle. Obviously I'm partial to Angus, as you can tell. Hereford beef when done right like Angus is really good.
I'm confused when I hear people say that Angus don't hold up. I would like to see what the Angus in question look like and how they are being cared for. I can't speak for others, but if it had been -40 below, our cattle would have been fine. Would I have calved in -40, no, let's have some common sense (not implying you said that).
I have some bulls available right now that should be VERY efficient based on their genomic epds and those of the sire and dam, DMI and $EN, but I don't think they will have overly big weaning weights (they would probably produce 575-675 205's with no creep feed) unless your mommas are doing their jobs as well. If I were selling to the feedlot, which I'm not, but if I were I would want to see a bull that has high marbling EPD's, as well as high $QG and $YG. I have some that deliver that, but they lose some of the DMI and $EN in the process. Not overly so, but they sure aren't in the top 3% of the breed for DMI and $EN and still have the other traits you seek.
What you are asking for is a highly efficient animal that can marble well and perform on the feedlot. I'm not sure of the marbling scores on your dams, but maybe cross a high $EN, DMI sire to those Hereford dams and see what results. It could work very well. Another thing I like about the purebred Angus momma, a good one at that, is that they produce VERY RICH milk, that helps to get that calf up there in size. I know people will come after me on that one, but it's true, Angus milk is like heavy cream to that growing calf.