DOC HARRIS
Well-known member
ABSOLUTELY RIGHT! By the same token - just BECAUSE the soil is optimal does not mean that the meat produced ON that soil will be optimal. Better chance - but no guarantees! EVERYTHING that goes into producing a product for a satisfactory eating experience MUST be quintessential or the results are unsatisfactory. This is exactly why the answer to "Adequate and Proper Nutrition" is paramount to a successful Beef operation - and it can be accomplished in a variety of ways, not just one.I agree completely. Out west of seguin my dad's got a ranch, coastal pastures, but knows little about soils and nutrients and how that affects the cattle. If you reap hay every season off of the same pasture over and over and never put cattle in that pasture, the quality of grass and soil there go down the drain, right?
By the way - "ORGANIC" Food and Feed is a fine idea - but not the ONLY idea. I worked for a "Health Food Store" in Los Angeles when I was in College, and therefore I am in a position to see both sides of the question. All I can say is, "SHEEESH!" It is about 68.573% Merchandising Hooey - and about 54.846% factual and legitimate reality. Making the total of 123.419% a little out of balance with the truth. The REAL truth about balancing the soil correctly with Natural Organic Matter and REPLACING rather than SUPPLANTING the natural Chemical balance with correct fertilization is hidden somewhere in the 23.419% difference!
This is another example of why I keep hammering and pounding on reading, thinking, and educating yourself on EVERYTHING, rather than listening to every stupid cockamamie and crack-pot rumor that comes across the table! MODERATION IN EVERYTHING!
DOC HARRIS