CowCop":duvoumgi said:
Thank you for the replys.
An other information ?
AMD Seems slower as well.
Processors can only really be compared when hooked up to machines designed only to test processors (vs a computer). If a system with an AMD (or Intel) processor "seems" slower then it is due to either a hardware/software problem or more likely, because the other compoenents in the computer are slowing it down.
Judging a computer by the speed of its processor is like jusging an auto by the horsepower. Sure, it gives a general idea, but the actual speed it will run at is determined by other factors. The same applies to computers. The other factors are:
* Amount of memory
* Speed of memory
* Architecture of various components
* Graphics card speeds
* Hard drive speed/data rate
To give you an idea, I just ordered to components for a new computer. I am keeping the processor from my 3-4 year old system. I am increasing the amount of memory I have by only 25%, but getting much faster memory. My new hard drive is only about twice as big as my existing one, but significantly faster. In my old system it was the other components that were the bottleneck for overall speed. With the upgraded components it is probably the processor that is the bottleneck (but not by that much).
Most people look at the raw numbers (processor speed mostly) when purchasing a computer. Because of this companies put in faster processors but skimp on other components. I guarentee that any custom built computer will run at LEAST 10-15% faster than a similarly speced OEM computer. Another reason why you might be noticing it being slower is that your new computer probably runs Windows Vista instead of XP, which is far, far slower because it demands many more system resources.
And I agree with rockridgecattle, clean it out at least once per year. Newer computers have far more fans and are far more dependant on cooling to function. This is why you used to be able to put a computer on a factory floor for 5 years and never have a problem. Now days you can expect regular failure in that environment.
Well that was a bit longer than I planned.