What's hybrid vigor? This baby is PUREBRED ANGUS!

Help Support CattleToday:

BH, the growth you are getting is very good. I think I do pretty well with the growth of my purebred calves as well and have not had any desire to cross breed. Just remember that the growth you are getting will not influence their EPD's as your calves are only compared against your own calves in that management group. I don't really know what you are trying to achieve with your fastidious care and feeding, just raising them on your great Kentucky pasture would serve the same purpose of differentiating the high achievers.

Ken
 
I don't have doubts about hybrid vigor. And when it comes to genetics, it is a fundamental scientific fact proven and tested for almost a 100 years that when two diverse genetic pools are mixed by interbreeding, the offspring display heterosis. Pick up any 200 level genetics text book and you will see a chapter in the index covering the concept of heterosis.

Having said that, as a breeding stock producer, my buyers prefer purebred. Why? Because they want to experience the direct results of hybrid vigor/heterosis in their F1 crosses. Most of my Simmental bulls are sold to commercial guys who are using them on mostly Angus influenced herds. They want a purebred Simmental.
 
************* said:
Ebenezer said:
************* said:
All the cross bred cattle around me are small compared to what I'm producing. Why would I think otherwise?
Maybe you can find some pictures of crossbred cattle owned by other folks to post for us. :lol:

Ask BR. I'm not sure people would want me posting photos of what I see.

I can confirm that your herd is much more uniform, better conformation, and bigger than the surrounding herds of mixed cattle.

That does not diminish the merits of cross breeding. It does confirm that your father is an excellent breeder who has achieved his goals.
 
************* said:
sim.-ang.king said:
Hybrid Vigor doesn't exists they said, don't crossbreed they said.


25104342678_734394271a_h.jpg


Nuff said.

Am I missing something?
Quite a bit.
 
ALACOWMAN said:
Ebenezer said:
************* said:
Am I missing something?
Quite a bit.
plus the fact he equates ""bigger"" with crossbreeding ...that's usually the end result in a crossbred 3 way system..

That "little" sim-ang steer weighed 1425# when he went to slaughter at a year and a half. That was after being on a holding ration, and pasture for 3 months so he wouldn't be over finished, or get placed in a heavier weight class for the shows. That's a lot of meat on a small frame.

48307859391_5884109f6a_h.jpg
 
Having said that, as a breeding stock producer, my buyers prefer purebred.
Enlighten me. Historically the term purebred has been acknowledged to mean sans other breeds in a pedigree. Some breed associations that allow "breeding up" unfortunately opted to bastardize that concept. Curious to know your thoughts on this issue.
 
Ok, I get it now, you all have cleared up everything for me, especially the "bless his heart" comment, I know the translation of that phrase.

Here is what I should "theoretically" do with my herd if I'm correct.

First, stick by the textbook. I should head over to the stockyards, or perhaps borrow the neighbor's bull, even though his pedigree is dubious at best, and take what I've built and breed them all to a non Angus bull?

Then I stand back in awe of the explosive, growth and fertility that I have produced.

Then I wonder to myself, how are you ever going to fix this mess you have created, LOL!

I mentioned a while back that I would like, as an experiment to have a Shorthorn/Angus mix commercial group, and several people on here said that I would get "killed" when I went to sell them, even my ABS rep said, get that nonsense out of your head. That told me a lot, because I consider Shorthorns to be very fine cattle.

I think I will stick with my plan, there seems to be a fair amount of interest and demand for Angus, especially fully backgrounded, healthy, and uniform Angus.
 
************* said:
Ok, I get it now, you all have cleared up everything for me, especially the "bless his heart" comment, I know the translation of that phrase.

Here is what I should "theoretically" do with my herd if I'm correct.

First, stick by the textbook. I should head over to the stockyards, or perhaps borrow the neighbor's bull, even though his pedigree is dubious at best, and take what I've built and breed them all to a non Angus bull?

Then I stand back in awe of the explosive, growth and fertility that I have produced.

Then I wonder to myself, how are you ever going to fix this mess you have created, LOL!

I mentioned a while back that I would like, as an experiment to have a Shorthorn/Angus mix commercial group, and several people on here said that I would get "killed" when I went to sell them, even my ABS rep said, get that nonsense out of your head. That told me a lot, because I consider Shorthorns to be very fine cattle.

I think I will stick with my plan, there seems to be a fair amount of interest and demand for Angus, especially fully backgrounded, healthy, and uniform Angus.

Man, I like seeing photos of big cows, just like I like riding in a corvette, even though it's useless on my farm. Also, I learn from the posts, good, bad, different whatever.
BUT, you gotta start figuring out that condemning a proven science, and fellow ranchers, because you are successful at something different, makes NO logical sense. It's the same as me saying, I'm 6'4" tall, so there's no one who can't reach the top shelf at walmart.
Or maybe even, I don't wear a seat belt, and I'm still alive, so seat belts are stupid.

You came in here and said, "I'm successful, therefore other methods aren't effective" and now you're trying to dig yourself out by saying "Then I wonder to myself, how are you ever going to fix this mess you have created, LOL!" You blamed everyone else for being wrong, and now you act like we all started it. :bs:
I made some rookie mistakes when I first joined the forum, but I learned my lesson. and as entertaining as some of these posts become...you might consider doing the same.
 
76 Bar said:
Having said that, as a breeding stock producer, my buyers prefer purebred.
Enlighten me. Historically the term purebred has been acknowledged to mean sans other breeds in a pedigree. Some breed associations that allow "breeding up" unfortunately opted to bastardize that concept. Curious to know your thoughts on this issue.

The openness of breed Associations such as the American Simmental Association are founded in the bylaws. ASA permits the registration of percentage animals and "breeding up" to Purebred. As to how that influences hybrid vigor or heterosis:

You could make an argument that it might mitigate the potency of heterosis. It would be extremely difficult to quantify much less qualify. My thought is that if the pedigree of the "purebred" sire demonstrates the two breeds have been isolated, the potency of the heterosis is going to be high. Specific to my circumstances, I try to avoid percentage sires. I want my bulls to have a long pedigree going back to only purebred Simmentals. Most of the beef cattle in Kentucky are Angus influenced. My buyers appreciate that putting those purebreds on primarily Angus cows insures a high level of potency in the F1 generation.

I might add, my buyers also appreciate the muscle, bone and growth that Simmental naturally bring to the table.
 
Bcompton53 said:
************* said:
Ok, I get it now, you all have cleared up everything for me, especially the "bless his heart" comment, I know the translation of that phrase.

Here is what I should "theoretically" do with my herd if I'm correct.

First, stick by the textbook. I should head over to the stockyards, or perhaps borrow the neighbor's bull, even though his pedigree is dubious at best, and take what I've built and breed them all to a non Angus bull?

Then I stand back in awe of the explosive, growth and fertility that I have produced.

Then I wonder to myself, how are you ever going to fix this mess you have created, LOL!

I mentioned a while back that I would like, as an experiment to have a Shorthorn/Angus mix commercial group, and several people on here said that I would get "killed" when I went to sell them, even my ABS rep said, get that nonsense out of your head. That told me a lot, because I consider Shorthorns to be very fine cattle.

I think I will stick with my plan, there seems to be a fair amount of interest and demand for Angus, especially fully backgrounded, healthy, and uniform Angus.

Man, I like seeing photos of big cows, just like I like riding in a corvette, even though it's useless on my farm. Also, I learn from the posts, good, bad, different whatever.
BUT, you gotta start figuring out that condemning a proven science, and fellow ranchers, because you are successful at something different, makes NO logical sense. It's the same as me saying, I'm 6'4" tall, so there's no one who can't reach the top shelf at walmart.
Or maybe even, I don't wear a seat belt, and I'm still alive, so seat belts are stupid.

You came in here and said, "I'm successful, therefore other methods aren't effective" and now you're trying to dig yourself out by saying "Then I wonder to myself, how are you ever going to fix this mess you have created, LOL!" You blamed everyone else for being wrong, and now you act like we all started it. :bs:
I made some rookie mistakes when I first joined the forum, but I learned my lesson. and as entertaining as some of these posts become...you might consider doing the same.

I'm just saying that I've heard from all the locals how I need to breed to Gelbvieh or Charolais, you name it, ANYTHING but Angus, and if I do that, the results will be amazing. I don't buy it, it's nonsense. They cannot show me anything on their operation that would make me say "I need to change ASAP".

Lately there has been a LOT of complaining about the wretched state of the cattle business, and how the prices are horrible, especially in the Southeast. I have my thoughts on why that is the case, but it would take a whole new thread and it would make a LOT of people on here VERY angry, so I will hold my thoughts on that subject.

Recently I saw an auctioneer post on Facebook the price he obtained on a group of purebred Angus steers. I'm pretty sure it was $1.57 for 9 weights, average weight was around 950 pounds. The sale was in Iowa where they REALLY know cattle, same goes for Nebraska. Compare those prices to Bluegrass and they are laughable, or sad by compare. People are going to have a harder and harder time staying in the business because of "old beliefs" that simply don't produce a product that is in high demand.

While I have had my spats with NEFarmWife, I bet she would be hard-pressed to say that Angus doesn't rule the roost in her area, and I bet they aren't complaining about getting killed when they sell high-quality Angus steers. I bet their checks are fat, like their steers.

I don't know jack squat about NEFarmWife's business, but I would bet you dollars to donuts that she runs circles around the average prices received in the Southeast on mixed breed steers.
 
Bright Raven said:
76 Bar said:
Having said that, as a breeding stock producer, my buyers prefer purebred.
Enlighten me. Historically the term purebred has been acknowledged to mean sans other breeds in a pedigree. Some breed associations that allow "breeding up" unfortunately opted to bastardize that concept. Curious to know your thoughts on this issue.

The openness of breed Associations such as the American Simmental Association are founded in the bylaws. ASA permits the registration of percentage animals and "breeding up" to Purebred. As to how that influences hybrid vigor or heterosis:

You could make an argument that it might mitigate the potency of heterosis. It would be extremely difficult to quantify much less qualify. My thought is that if the pedigree of the "purebred" sire demonstrates the two breeds have been isolated, the potency of the heterosis is going to be high. Specific to my circumstances, I try to avoid percentage sires. I want my bulls to have a long pedigree going back to only purebred Simmentals. Most of the beef cattle in Kentucky are Angus influenced. My buyers appreciate that putting those purebreds on primarily Angus cows insures a high level of potency in the F1 generation.

I might add, my buyers also appreciate the muscle, bone and growth that Simmental naturally bring to the table.

SAV America 8018 weaned at 1107 pounds at 205 adjusted. You simply cannot feed an animal to that weight, it takes genetics. He is not crossed with Balancers, Charolais, or whatever, he's Angus. Not many folks I know in Kentucky are weaning a bull off at that weight, nor will they ever achieve that lofty goal.

I don't have time to waste on this, but I bet I could take a cow/bull calf from the yards, and put him up against a President calf from one of my best cows, and it would be no contest. I could feed the mystery bull MORE than I feed President and he would still not catch up. It amazes me that genetics are ignored to the extent they are around here.

You can't turn a person who is 150 pounds as an adult, and suddenly feed him until he looks like The Rock. The same applies to cattle.
 
sim.-ang.king said:
ALACOWMAN said:
Ebenezer said:
Quite a bit.
plus the fact he equates ""bigger"" with crossbreeding ...that's usually the end result in a crossbred 3 way system..

That "little" sim-ang steer weighed 1425# when he went to slaughter at a year and a half. That was after being on a holding ration, and pasture for 3 months so he wouldn't be over finished, or get placed in a heavier weight class for the shows. That's a lot of meat on a small frame.

48307859391_5884109f6a_h.jpg

Now my question for you, and it's a serious one. Do you have any idea of the carcass quality of this steer? What is the story on the sire? If I was a buyer for Creekstone or some other outfit like them, what would you be able to tell me about this steer or group of steers that would compel me to pay a premium?

He's a fine animal, and I would like to know more about him.
 
Not that it matters, but shorthorn are too simular in type to get much benefit from crossing with Angus..if I were going in any direction with them it would be Hereford hands down.a Tried and true, no apology cross that will sell anywhere..great cattle.
 
ALACOWMAN said:
Not that it matters, but shorthorn are too simular in type to get much benefit from crossing with Angus..if I were going in any direction with them it would be Hereford hands down.a Tried and true, no apology cross that will sell anywhere..great cattle.

If we could get any Australians to chime in, they might disagree. I believe that I read where the Angus/Shorthorn cross had the highest carcass scores and brought the highest prices in a test they had down there. I will see if I can find the information. The Aussies breed some very fine cattle from what I've seen.
 
ALACOWMAN said:
Not that it matters, but shorthorn are too simular in type to get much benefit from crossing with Angus..if I were going in any direction with them it would be Hereford hands down.a Tried and true, no apology cross that will sell anywhere..great cattle.

This was my understanding also. The best advantage can be obtained crossing british breed with continentals. But these are pretty generic statements. Probably depends some on the individual bloodlines/traits.
 
Bcompton53 said:
ALACOWMAN said:
Not that it matters, but shorthorn are too simular in type to get much benefit from crossing with Angus..if I were going in any direction with them it would be Hereford hands down.a Tried and true, no apology cross that will sell anywhere..great cattle.

This was my understanding also. The best advantage can be obtained crossing british breed with continentals. But these are pretty generic statements. Probably depends some on the individual bloodlines/traits.


Absolutely the worst cross for hybrid vigor is SH/Angus the most was Hereford/Brahman cross. Lots of old research data out of MSU,UFla and TAMU on the different crosses. Dr. David Riley has a series on improving herd genetics and maximizing hybrid vigor through cross breeding.
There is a lot of good info in here.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/39273033_D_G_Riley/amp
 
James' cattle do NOT need hybrid vigor. His cattle are on the top end of Angus size/weight wise.
Some on here will remember all the ads AAA ran bashing the ELEPHANT breed (Simmentals). Now, the Angus breed is the ELEPHANT breed.

http://www.angus.org/Pub/Newsroom/Releases/022014_PlansforExpansiveCommunicationsCenter.aspx
"In 1984, the Association launched the "Elephant ads," arguably the most memorable advertising campaign in the history of the cattle industry. The campaign was created by PR director Keith Evans and Bob Watkins of Fletcher-Mayo Associates."
 

Latest posts

Top