DOC HARRIS":8yzw0l1a said:
Arnold Ziffle":8yzw0l1a said:
Doc, it seems to me that you, tapeworm and a few others may have skinned his hide a little but none of you bothered to explicitly and specifically tell him what you thought was wrong with his bull (based on the one picture he submitted) unless perhaps that was done via a PM. At least Jake hit one nail on the head (well, at least in my view he did). Dane12 posted that he "would bite" and was clearly asking for some specifics --- what may seem obvious to you, tapeworm and others was perhaps not so obvious to dane12. Why don't you fire away, in the spirit of constructive criticism? Maybe others besides dane12 can learn somethhing too.
AZ - I agree with your censure of my previous post regarding the picture of Dane 12's bull. I spent two hours this morning attempting to be concise, accurate and specific in judging the 'picture of the bull'. I did a wonderful job! It was a great set of reasons! I said exactly what I wanted to say! I was proud of myself!
Then, in reading what I had written - - - - I did not submit my wonderful work, and L O S T the whole, stupid thing!!
Notice I blamed the "work" of being "STUPID" - not the 'worker" :shock: Therefore, I shall calm down, regroup, go out and walk down and get the mail, and attempt to remember what spectacular words I used to reply to your correct assessment of my mental aberrations!
I have said many times, when you pass the age of 39 - -"it" all flies out the window!" Well, Folks, I am older than 39, and "it" has flown the coop, window and all, many times. But I shall attempt to give some kind of a reasonable critique of the white, horned bull in question here. Please bear with me for a few minutes. :help:
We are considerating a male, bovine to be used as a Breeding Bull for a small herd "(8 cows+3 heifers+3 calves+1bullcalv from last year + 1 bull)", and will be judging him
on his own merits.
The first impression which comes to mind in observing this bull is that he is standing in knee-deep grass, which makes it difficult to ascertain his true relative body proportions, however in 'looking through the grass" it seems that he is rather 'leggy, therefore his general appearance seems rather short coupled. In transmitting these characteristics to his female offspring, any replacement heifers which would be kept for brood cows would lack capacity and possible difficult calving could be expected. He also appears to be lacking somewhat in bone density.
This bull exhibits a strong, level back or top line carrying through to his rump - a positive factor! Also a broad loin and rib eye. His heart girth is just average for a Bull. He seems a little narrow across his chest, however that is in accord with light bone structure. He definitely lacks thickness, fullness and DEPTH in his rear quarters (for the CHARLAIS Breed ).
What this bull may or will be in the future is subjective. What he "looks like" now (phenotype) is objective, and this picture is all we have by which to judge him. I agree with Tapeworm - he would have made a fine terminal steer. Just a few of my thoughts and opinions.
I feel that any small breeder (or large- herd breeder for that matter) would be well-advised to use the VERY BEST Bull genetics he can FIND and AI your cows and, generation after generation, breed UP - keeping the best replacement heifers, and very soon you have a POPPIN' herd of cows and $Profit in the bank. Using the best Registered Bulls of whatever breed you select and incorporting Artificial Insemination is no more expensive than keeping and feeding live bulls of less than adequate quality and prepotency. Using Purebred Bulls consistently will improve your cross-breeding program exponentially!