inyati13":1705zmos said:
Lucky, you and Cross are saying about the same thing. Giving the TAT when banding at birth or the first 10 days post-partum is not an approach that I personally would subscribe to. There is not going to be open tissue for at least a few weeks or perhaps not at all. In the calves I have banded at birth, I do not see an exposed opening until considerable time after banding and often times not then. In fact, as you say the frequency of tetanus due to banding at birth or within the first 10 days post-partum is low compared to banding at say 400 pounds. I have recovered a few of the dried scrotal sacs from calves I have banded at birth or shortly after. In fact, I rarely see any fresh tissue exposed. It is usually dried. Nevertheless, I would hate to lose one. I will recosider my protocols to include giving the TT at the time of banding and boostering in 3 to 4 weeks. Having said that, I just cannot immagine the risk unless there is a much greater frequency of open tissue than what I have observed when they are banded at such a young age.
The tetanus antitoxin will give protection for about 7-14 days, the tetanus toxoid takes a few weeks to build immunities, so that would be the protocol I'd go with, but I wouldn't chance it, I wouldn't band at birth, I was just stating what I would do
I feel like I get a little more growth leaving them intact and I prefer to cut them t about 300#. I also don't like to stress a baby calf.
Everyone has a different opinion
For me in my situation in a pasture environment the cow wouldn't allow me to get to the calf
I have, do and will again band, but I think it is much easier on the calf to knife cut, most times within minutes they are right back to normal after being cut and never miss a beat.
I have had banded calves that seem to really be sore for along time.
If I were in your situation it would be different, but I would take every precaution