Strength In Numbers

Help Support CattleToday:

MikeC

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
7,636
Reaction score
3
Location
Alabama
Strategies for Small Producers: Strength in numbers
Aug 6, 2007 3:39 PM

Marketing calves in groups, rather than as individuals, can help command a higher price at the sale barn. That's the finding of research by Tom Troxel of the University of Arkansas.

Troxel evaluated factors that affected sale price of Arkansas beef calves as they were marketed in fifteen Arkansas livestock auction markets in 2005. He reported on data from over 100,000 head of calves sold in 52,401 lots. Several interesting price differences were noted.

Calves selling as groups of six head or more brought $122.61/hundredweight, while calves selling as singles sold for $117.26/hundredweight. This indicates producing uniform groups of calves that are marketed together has added value.

Healthy appearing calves of unknown "processing" brought $118.21, which was more than calves with "dead" hair ($105.55), stale-looking calves ($100.01), sick calves ($80.22), bad eyes ($104.39) or lame ($84.74) calves. However, if the calves were announced as "preconditioned", they sold for a higher price ($122.36) compared to the healthy unknown ($118.21) calves.

Polled calves still sell for more than horned calves by $3.70 per hundredweight and the difference between steers and bulls was $6.27 per hundredweight.

Very full or "tanked" calves were discounted about $10 to $17 per hundredweight compared to calves that appeared to have normal shrink.

Much of this data is consistent with information collected by eastern Oklahoma extension educators in 1997 and again in 1999 from fourteen Oklahoma auction markets. These researchers conclude that the bottom line is: properly managed, process-verified, calves that are sold in group lots will bring home the most dollars.
 
Dr. Troxel was a speaker at a meeting are county agent put together a few months ago. He covered this study and the only thing i dont see in this post that he covered at the meeting is color.

I dont remember the exact difference in price well enough to stand behind it, but think i remember the order they were in.

Highest to Lowest:

1. Black baldie

2. Yellow baldie

3. Yellow

4. Black

5. Red baldie

6. Red

7. Char

8.Brahma X and/or Long horn X




There wasnt much difference in #1 and #2 or #3 and #4.

( This is to the best of my memory)
 
Table 6. The Average Selling Price for Feeder Cattle Based on Calf Color

Average Selling Price (Value/cwt.)


Deviation From Overall Calf Color Average (Value/cwt.)
yellow $96.47 $2.78
yellow-white face $95.65 $1.96
black-white face $95.02 $1.54
white $94.93 $1.24
black $94.29 $0.60
red $92.74 -$0.95
gray $91.85 -$1.84
red-white face $91.81 -$1.88
gray-white face $91.73 -$1.96
spotted or striped $83.84 -$9.85

USDA
 
MikeC":3c42sx90 said:
Table 6. The Average Selling Price for Feeder Cattle Based on Calf Color

Average Selling Price (Value/cwt.)


Deviation From Overall Calf Color Average (Value/cwt.)
yellow $96.47 $2.78
yellow-white face $95.65 $1.96
black-white face $95.02 $1.54
white $94.93 $1.24
black $94.29 $0.60
red $92.74 -$0.95
gray $91.85 -$1.84
red-white face $91.81 -$1.88
gray-white face $91.73 -$1.96
spotted or striped $83.84 -$9.85

USDA


Table 5. The Average Selling Price for Feeder Cattle
Based on Calf Color
Calf Color
Average
Selling Price
(Value/cwt.)
Deviation From
Overall Average
(Value/cwt.)
yellow-white face $120.44 a $2.34
yellow $120.29 a $2.19
black-white face $120.03 a $1.93
black $119.24 b $1.14
gray $117.66 c -$0.44
gray-white face $116.79 c,d -$1.31
white $116.01 d -$2.09
red-white face $114.58 e -$3.52
red $113.92 f -$4.18
spotted or striped $107.37 g -$10.73

Where did you get you data? It seems to be the same but different in magnitude.
 
MikeC":2iqlfx4c said:
I think mine is a couple of years old.

I thought it might be. I doesn't seem to have changed much according to pecking order though.
 
sewall":2mrerh6x said:
Does that info hold true for down here in Texas?

I think it's a national average.

Is Texas considered "national"? :lol:
 
MikeC":3tx6xbz5 said:
sewall":3tx6xbz5 said:
Does that info hold true for down here in Texas?

I think it's a national average.

Is Texas considered "national"? :lol:

No.. once you leave Texas you are going straight down hill.

Bush was fine until he got corrupted in Washington.
laugh.gif


Only thing is down here you don't get docked for the Brahman influence.
 
[/quote]No.. once you leave Texas you are going straight down hill[/quote]

I agree with Brute. :lol:
 
Remember Bush got corrupted when he went to Washington DC not Washington. Two completely different places. We don't corrupt people here......... well there was that young gal that I...... oh, different subject.
 

Latest posts

Top