SOCIAL SECURITY

[Anonymous]

But we are losing our "liberties", we are just losing them slowly! Why is the president involved with the adult film industry? I personally don't like that business, but I do think they have the right make their films if they want to. And I have a right to not buy them if I choose to! Why is the president involved in the free speech issue? Who is he to say what is decent and what isn't? While I don't like alot of whats on TV and radio nowadays, I believe they have a right to put it out there. Theres nothing illegal about what they are doing. His opinions should not become laws. Our forefathers fought to give us free speech, and now he wants to take them away? Not real sure where you are coming from when you say Democrats want to give away money for women who squirt out more kids than a prize cow, but thats just not true. Do you think Bush is going to tell these women that we aren't gonna help you?There have always been social programs to help poor folks, the Democrats didn't just think this up recently. Am I for this? Of course not! But maybe if there were more jobs available, then at least some of these folks would get on someone elses payroll besides the gov't! There will always be the lazy slackers who will try and cheat the gov't for free food and money, but thats not any particular parties fault. Judging from your work ethics, this shouldnt be a concern of yours, as you will always find work and support yourself and your family.

I wish my life were so simple and uncomplicated that I could base my voting decision solely on the ability to listen to Howard Stern or watch porn.

 

[Anonymous]

CRR, sounds like you need to hurry up and move to Texas. Maybe you could swap places with Eric. He might appreciate the social programs y'all have to put up with and we could use some more of your kind of reasoning down here. Circle around and bring CattleAnnie with you. We'll run some more up the chute with Eric and try to finish the load.

 

[Anonymous]

Not real sure where you are coming from when you say Democrats want to give away money for women who squirt out more kids than a prize cow, but thats just not true. Do you think Bush is going to tell these women that we aren't gonna help you?

You're wrong, Eric. Welfare is based on the number of kids a person has. More kids=more money. The democrats say "Have more we'll help you." The republicans say "We'll help you but only for a certain time. Then you have to help yourself."

 

[ollie]

Not real sure where you are coming from when you say Democrats want to give away money for women who squirt out more kids than a prize cow, but thats just not true. Do you think Bush is going to tell these women that we aren't gonna help you?

You're wrong, Eric. Welfare is based on the number of kids a person has. More kids=more money. The democrats say "Have more we'll help you." The republicans say "We'll help you but only for a certain time. Then you have to help yourself."

I certainly don't agree with the deragotory implications that stupid people have so many kids that the rest of us smart people just have two and have to pay for all theirs. My original and only wife and I have four kids and if they were all like ours we should have had forty. Not one cent has anyone ever paid for us to help raise them and we don't want anyone to. They are our blessing and our responsibility. Maybe if us smart people weren't so selfish we would have more kids and out number them , besides who is going to contribute to social security if not our kids? The older I get the more I realize that kids are like barns full of hay... you can't have too many.

 

[Anonymous]

By no means did I mean to imply that EVERYONE who has lots of kids are on welfare or are stupid. What I did say is that the more kids you have the more money you get from welfare. If you were eligible for welfare and chose to accept the welfare, you would receive more money from the government if you had 6 kids than if you only had 2. People can have as many kids as they want AND can afford, but they shouldn't expect the government (i.e. taxpayer money) to help them raise them.