VanC
Well-known member
HOSS":323bl7ur said:My opinion is that it should be left strictly up to the establishment or business. I don't smoke and don't really like being around it...BUT...a private business has a RIGHT to decide if they wish to allow smoking in all of their facility, part of their facility or no smoking at all. Before we had the smoking ban here in TN, when I went into a resturaunt I made a decision on whether or not I wanted to patronize that establishment. If the smoke was too bad I would leave. I exercised my right to not patronize that business but I had no right to demand that the owner of the business give up his. Market conditions will drive a business owner to either allow or disallow smoking. I also exercise my right to not patronize businesses that post signs banning concealed carry on their premesis but I have no problem with their right to post such sign either as long as it is not public property or a public right-of-way.
That's exactly the way I feel, HOSS. We've had a statewide smoking ban everywhere that the public has access to for a couple of years now. Before that, each privately owned business had the freedom to make up their own mind whether they would allow smoking or not, and the general public could decide for themselves which businesses they would patronize. Worked pretty well, but that's just not good enough for some people. There is a growing, powerful lobby of holier-than-thou busybodies out there that think if someone is doing something they don't approve of then it's their business to put a stop to it. My state is one of the worst.