Dun wrote:TM includes the
daughters milk EPD plus half of her genetic contribution
to her calf's weaning weight EPD.
There you go dun.
Dun wrote:TM includes the
daughters milk EPD plus half of her genetic contribution
to her calf's weaning weight EPD.
The milk part is pretty simple. What we are having a problem with is why divide the ww in half?jnowack":3qx6n9zz said:Ollie,
A cows milk EPD is expressed in lbs of her calves weaning weight that is attiributed to her own dirict milk production. That is why you don't divide by 2 to get total maternal which is what her direct contibution to weaning weight is.
Tod Dague":zqy37bef said:The milk part is pretty simple. What we are having a problem with is why divide the ww in half?jnowack":zqy37bef said:Ollie,
A cows milk EPD is expressed in lbs of her calves weaning weight that is attiributed to her own dirict milk production. That is why you don't divide by 2 to get total maternal which is what her direct contibution to weaning weight is.
We had but I still don't get it. I thought that the ww EPD represented the cow's or bull's genetic half of the EPD. When compairing bulls you don't cut the WW EPD in half. If he shows a 5 lb advantave in ww we don't say well it's really only 2.5 lb.MikeC":2g283zmx said:Tod Dague":2g283zmx said:The milk part is pretty simple. What we are having a problem with is why divide the ww in half?jnowack":2g283zmx said:Ollie,
A cows milk EPD is expressed in lbs of her calves weaning weight that is attiributed to her own dirict milk production. That is why you don't divide by 2 to get total maternal which is what her direct contibution to weaning weight is.
I thought we had gone over this.
Because the cow only contributes half of the genetic potential to the weaning weight EPD. Same for the bull.