Warrior2154
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2012
- Messages
- 111
- Reaction score
- 1
One of the best cow makers in past decade. Best son is S S Niagara at Select. Combines Hoover dam and 454.
CreekAngus said:I never used Hoover Dam, just got back in the biz and he wasn't on my radar. Actually, I think I under appreciated him. Saw his sales stats from Origen today and they were incredible. He was a generational bull who crossed over into the commercial sector as well and a bull who was not surpassed by any of his progeny. Many of our current "popular" bulls are being replaced by their own progeny, not the case for Dam, which makes him a great one.
TennesseeTuxedo said:Hard to argue that logic.
He was still a dandy.
TennesseeTuxedo said:Hard to argue that logic.
He was still a dandy.
Name the sons of New Design 208, New Day, Final Answer, 004, Hoover Dam who have exceeded them? I always hear or read,"whose the best on of so and so?". I always wonder, why not just use so and so. To me a generational bull is one who isn't surpassed by his progeny, because he is far superior to his sons. But I do understand where you are coming from.LCBulls said:CreekAngus said:I never used Hoover Dam, just got back in the biz and he wasn't on my radar. Actually, I think I under appreciated him. Saw his sales stats from Origen today and they were incredible. He was a generational bull who crossed over into the commercial sector as well and a bull who was not surpassed by any of his progeny. Many of our current "popular" bulls are being replaced by their own progeny, not the case for Dam, which makes him a great one.
I believe that if a bull is that good and has that many sons then there should be multiple Sons as good or better than him.
That's why I asked the question. It's like saying that he doesn't produce high quality calves. I personally think that's a weakness, not a strength. The ones that are producing better sons are the ones to use in my opinion.
CreekAngus said:Name the sons of New Design 208, New Day, Final Answer, 004, Hoover Dam who have exceeded them? I always hear or read,"whose the best on of so and so?". I always wonder, why not just use so and so. To me a generational bull is one who isn't surpassed by his progeny, because he is far superior to his sons. But I do understand where you are coming from.LCBulls said:CreekAngus said:I never used Hoover Dam, just got back in the biz and he wasn't on my radar. Actually, I think I under appreciated him. Saw his sales stats from Origen today and they were incredible. He was a generational bull who crossed over into the commercial sector as well and a bull who was not surpassed by any of his progeny. Many of our current "popular" bulls are being replaced by their own progeny, not the case for Dam, which makes him a great one.
I believe that if a bull is that good and has that many sons then there should be multiple Sons as good or better than him.
That's why I asked the question. It's like saying that he doesn't produce high quality calves. I personally think that's a weakness, not a strength. The ones that are producing better sons are the ones to use in my opinion.
TennesseeTuxedo said:Nothing wrong with a cow maker.
TennesseeTuxedo said:Nothing wrong with a cow maker.
CreekAngus said:LC Bulls: I don't think we are on the same page. You listed sons of Final Answer, but not a single one of them had the usage or influence of their sire and that's where I was going. Who do you consider is a generational bull?