memanpa
Well-known member
MOGAL
the carburator you refer to was mfg by FISH (if memory is correct)
yes i could get 50 mpg!
no FORD did not buy the patent!
it was nothing more than the old down draft type carb like i have on my 30 model "A" except it had a pressure chamber to increase vapors reaching the combustion chamber!!! the reason FORD< GMC CHRYSLER STUEBAKER and the rest did not buy the patent was because it could not be applied to modern, (even 50's cars) higher compression engines!
just another myth!!!!!!
yes there are more efficient ways to burn fuels but that old carb is not one of them!!! been around about as long as the old air/fuel/water myth!
the carburator you refer to was mfg by FISH (if memory is correct)
yes i could get 50 mpg!
no FORD did not buy the patent!
it was nothing more than the old down draft type carb like i have on my 30 model "A" except it had a pressure chamber to increase vapors reaching the combustion chamber!!! the reason FORD< GMC CHRYSLER STUEBAKER and the rest did not buy the patent was because it could not be applied to modern, (even 50's cars) higher compression engines!
just another myth!!!!!!
yes there are more efficient ways to burn fuels but that old carb is not one of them!!! been around about as long as the old air/fuel/water myth!