Engler
Well-known member
This whole thing has me confused. When we look at the Ferguson situation alone I'm sure there are 3 sides to the story (like everything else) the cops, the kids and the truth that probably is somewhere in the middle.
But when we look at the riots on a macro level doesn't it start to become a chicken and the egg discussion? The poor, black, young man can't get a job and has no future-kind of the standard rally cry. Well there are no jobs because there are no businesses there. There are no businesses there because they either A)can't find quality workers or B)can't get someone to work there for the price they are willing to pay.
Now a lot of us on here are business people/owners, either cattle or otherwise so maybe I'm preaching to the converted but I have a couple questions. If I am going to build a ____ business and I can either build in Ferguson that for the next generation is going to be saddled with this or Mayberry that has a squeaky clean reputation, why would I go to furguson? Even if I could get a good deal on land, building, tax breaks can you imagine trying to recruit employees to go there? Even if you could get a guy to sign on can you imagine what his wife would say when he comes home and says "Honey, good news, we're moving to Furguson, MO", my guess is it's going to be something like "Oh, hell no we're not".
I'm not sure if I remember the demographics exactly correct, but about 2/3 of the population is black, correct? Now let's assume that the business ownership is under represented by 50%, that still means that of the 12 businesses that were burned that 4 of them were owned by people of color. I understand people being mad, but nothing says I'm going to stick it to the man by burning down my own house. I know there are a lot of out of towners that are causing this problem, but are any of you all running to the St Louis subburgs to start a business, and is that the chicken or the egg?
But when we look at the riots on a macro level doesn't it start to become a chicken and the egg discussion? The poor, black, young man can't get a job and has no future-kind of the standard rally cry. Well there are no jobs because there are no businesses there. There are no businesses there because they either A)can't find quality workers or B)can't get someone to work there for the price they are willing to pay.
Now a lot of us on here are business people/owners, either cattle or otherwise so maybe I'm preaching to the converted but I have a couple questions. If I am going to build a ____ business and I can either build in Ferguson that for the next generation is going to be saddled with this or Mayberry that has a squeaky clean reputation, why would I go to furguson? Even if I could get a good deal on land, building, tax breaks can you imagine trying to recruit employees to go there? Even if you could get a guy to sign on can you imagine what his wife would say when he comes home and says "Honey, good news, we're moving to Furguson, MO", my guess is it's going to be something like "Oh, hell no we're not".
I'm not sure if I remember the demographics exactly correct, but about 2/3 of the population is black, correct? Now let's assume that the business ownership is under represented by 50%, that still means that of the 12 businesses that were burned that 4 of them were owned by people of color. I understand people being mad, but nothing says I'm going to stick it to the man by burning down my own house. I know there are a lot of out of towners that are causing this problem, but are any of you all running to the St Louis subburgs to start a business, and is that the chicken or the egg?