chaded
Well-known member
I think we have the regular ol' purebred yotes here.
Yes, I saw that. I've also seen several others that refute those numbers of that single study. That was one study, one study is often flawed. Even if they are true, it still means they're coyotes with a small amount of wolf DNA. They aren't a wolf or wolf cross. Studies of western coyotes can also show wolf DNA, they're still coyotes too. Remember that wolves and coyotes share a lot of ancestors and therfor DNA.Not according to the research scientist at Cornell Univ. "Supposedly" some really bad weather pushed the wolves around the top of Lake Michigan and mingled with the Eastern Coyote. The "new" coyotes that everyone thought was dog crossed, turned out to be WOLF cross,
Did you ignore the report Ky Hill posted - DNA tested : 64% coyote, 13% gray wolf, 13% eastern wolf, and 10% domestic dog. That's 1/4 wolf. This is NOT the DNA that would be because of "the beginning of dogs/coyotes". 26% IS a CROSS with wolves.
64% coyote would be considered a half blood in our industry.
So basically an argument about degrees and everyone is just as wrong as they are right until everyone agrees on definitions.Yes, I saw that. I've also seen several others that refute those numbers of that single study. That was one study, one study is often flawed. Even if they are true, it still means they're coyotes with a small amount of wolf DNA. They aren't a wolf or wolf cross. Studies of western coyotes can also show wolf DNA, they're still coyotes too. Remember that wolves and coyotes share a lot of ancestors and therfor DNA.
Likely bias because of the samples. I have an article somewhere that there is no red wolf on the east coast. They are merely coyote/dog crosses. Environmentalists are not always willing to give up without making things happen. In SC, the Carolina Heelsplitter mussel is considered endangered/rare/protected or something. But every time folks study a different stream they often find the mussel. So it is really rare or just not enough data to prove that it is actually widespread and not rare? But the protection is a pressure mechanism to control private land use so it is deemed good by environmentalist.So basically an argument about degrees and everyone is just as wrong as they are right until everyone agrees on definitions.
(facepalm)
I haven't seen a red wolf since the late 60's. When they started clear cutting the coyotes moved in .Likely bias because of the samples. I have an article somewhere that there is no red wolf on the east coast. They are merely coyote/dog crosses. Environmentalists are not always willing to give up without making things happen. In SC, the Carolina Heelsplitter mussel is considered endangered/rare/protected or something. But every time folks study a different stream they often find the mussel. So it is really rare or just not enough data to prove that it is actually widespread and not rare? But the protection is a pressure mechanism to control private land use so it is deemed good by environmentalist.
My buddy did a summer job for the feds over out towards Piccosin(?) and some other spots in NC that were specifically to track both quail and red wolf populations, there are certainly red wolves on the east coast.Likely bias because of the samples. I have an article somewhere that there is no red wolf on the east coast. They are merely coyote/dog crosses. Environmentalists are not always willing to give up without making things happen. In SC, the Carolina Heelsplitter mussel is considered endangered/rare/protected or something. But every time folks study a different stream they often find the mussel. So it is really rare or just not enough data to prove that it is actually widespread and not rare? But the protection is a pressure mechanism to control private land use so it is deemed good by environmentalist.