That's a hill I am willing to die on.He is holding off until the last to take the guns as he knows the SHTF when that starts happening, but it will.
I try to be careful what I say on the net, but mine will have to be taken too. They will be hard to find.That's a hill I am willing to die on.
To quote an old John Wayne movie " fill your hand you SOB!"
Brother Trent I am an old man not looking to go start trouble with anyone.I try to be careful what I say on the net, but mine will have to be taken too. They will be hard to find.
Historically I know of nowhere has gun ownership ever stopped a military invasion of a foreign country. Last I looked up it was nearly 750K fully automatic and over 3.7 million AR type weapons in the hands of citizens that's not counting the various others like 50 cal BMG. Historically it's never worked out for the world's militaries either, recent history of Vietnam and Afghanistan.An observation from afar, if a full on invasion happened do you believe your pop guns would even slow down soldiers equipped with military assault type weapons and equipment. You'd be dead before they even came within your range.
At this point in our country we still are allowed to own a lot better than "pop" guns. This isn't Australia, and that is not a dig or an attempt at arguing just sort of echoing what CB is saying. As far as foot soldiers on the ground go yes what we have here is a huge deterrent. Plenty of people here who can and do make several hundred meter shots routinely, not a lot of basic infantry can do that with a base AK so range is not the issue either. Heavy artillery and air strikes they may get the upper hand but on foot they would be well matched or out matched and that's the truth. A lot of past military experience to use them as well.An observation from afar, if a full on invasion happened do you believe your pop guns would even slow down soldiers equipped with military assault type weapons and equipment. You'd be dead before they even came within your range.
An observation from afar, if a full on invasion happened do you believe your pop guns would even slow down soldiers equipped with military assault type weapons and equipment. You'd be dead before they even came within your range.
I still got some ol hunting irons around. Had a pretty good pile of "fancier" ones and lots of ammo.I try to be careful what I say on the net, but mine will have to be taken too. They will be hard to find.
You are right it isn't Australia, apart from lower firepower, we simply don't have the population here or the percentage of population with military experience either. But civilians aren't very organised in general and the logistics of ammuntion supply i think they wouldn't make much resistance. Hopefully we never find out. I also can't see the countryside there supporting guerrilla warfare successfully.At this point in our country we still are allowed to own a lot better than "pop" guns. This isn't Australia, and that is not a dig or an attempt at arguing just sort of echoing what CB is saying. As far as foot soldiers on the ground go yes what we have here is a huge deterrent. Plenty of people here who can and do make several hundred meter shots routinely, not a lot of basic infantry can do that with a base AK so range is not the issue either. Heavy artillery and air strikes they may get the upper hand but on foot they would be well matched or out matched and that's the truth. A lot of past military experience to use them as well.
It is a known fact that it deterred Japan from mainland invasion in WW2. The govt is pushing for more leverage and control all the time and we are being pushed towards subjects instead of citizens. We will not surrender them for all those reasons and then some.
Edit to add: Farmers and woodsmen with guns took this country from Britain the powerhouse military at the time and held it as a young country again in 1812 so yes armed citizens can very much hold their own if necessary.
I hope your rightWhat % of the military do you think would follow tyrant orders? What if rogue leaders were targeted rather than the foot solider as some mention guerilla warfare? Do you think any who would assume to be tyrants are brave enough?
Ammo won't be a problem for years.You are right it isn't Australia, apart from lower firepower, we simply don't have the population here or the percentage of population with military experience either. But civilians aren't very organised in general and the logistics of ammuntion supply i think they wouldn't make much resistance. Hopefully we never find out. I also can't see the countryside there supporting guerrilla warfare successfully.
But with civilians backing up your own military, i can't see a country or axis ever being able to make any inroads in an invasion there.
Not many this will be like Lee all over.I hope your right