backhoeboogie
Well-known member
In the classic gun fight, my chances of survival would probably be about 50%. My survival would be more dependant on my aim, being second to my reflexes to draw my gun with speed.
The Hoolywood drama of John Wayne shooting dead aimed of off the back of a horse in full gallop is about the same chances of me winning a lotto. We all know that these things only happen in the movies.
My nerve would come into play. I would be taking aim while bullets were being hurled in my direction. This folks, is probably more nerve than I truly posses and afterwards I would indeed be shaking. This would be a no win situation all the way around. IF I survived, someone else's son/father/brother would not. If I did not, who would look after my family?
The recent death of 32 people and an additonal suicide is being debated repetitively in various forums and discussions. Inevitably, gun control comes up. In my opinion, only a coward would take up arms against defenseless individuals. If there was half a chance that some individuals in that building would have been armed, this coward would have never done what he did in the first place. He would have never attained the sense of control he sickly took during the incident. His actions were as cowardice as they come. We would have never known of this mental state of mind and we would be discussing and arguing about something else.
This opinion of mine would fit into other discussions but I offer it in a new thread since there is a potential this could create emotions and locking of another's thread.
The Hoolywood drama of John Wayne shooting dead aimed of off the back of a horse in full gallop is about the same chances of me winning a lotto. We all know that these things only happen in the movies.
My nerve would come into play. I would be taking aim while bullets were being hurled in my direction. This folks, is probably more nerve than I truly posses and afterwards I would indeed be shaking. This would be a no win situation all the way around. IF I survived, someone else's son/father/brother would not. If I did not, who would look after my family?
The recent death of 32 people and an additonal suicide is being debated repetitively in various forums and discussions. Inevitably, gun control comes up. In my opinion, only a coward would take up arms against defenseless individuals. If there was half a chance that some individuals in that building would have been armed, this coward would have never done what he did in the first place. He would have never attained the sense of control he sickly took during the incident. His actions were as cowardice as they come. We would have never known of this mental state of mind and we would be discussing and arguing about something else.
This opinion of mine would fit into other discussions but I offer it in a new thread since there is a potential this could create emotions and locking of another's thread.