alisonb
Well-known member
I have been using a tape measure to give me an estimation of an animals weight for some time now and it has proved to be relatively accurate when comparing it to actual scale weights. It seems to be more accurate on younger animals though.
I culled a cow this week (fertility problems) and when I got the weight from the butcher the difference between tape weight and actual weight would have been a lot different. Here are the details -
Tape weight - 880kg (1936 lbs). Chest measured 2.23m (87,80")
Slaughtered weight (cold carcass) - 378kg (832 lbs)
That's about 43% of live weight. I usually expect a % closer to 50%. She was in very good condition, could fat have made a big difference or is the tape measure not very reliable would you think? When measuring a big animal should one allow for about a 50kg (110 lb) error margin?
I culled a cow this week (fertility problems) and when I got the weight from the butcher the difference between tape weight and actual weight would have been a lot different. Here are the details -
Tape weight - 880kg (1936 lbs). Chest measured 2.23m (87,80")
Slaughtered weight (cold carcass) - 378kg (832 lbs)
That's about 43% of live weight. I usually expect a % closer to 50%. She was in very good condition, could fat have made a big difference or is the tape measure not very reliable would you think? When measuring a big animal should one allow for about a 50kg (110 lb) error margin?