True Grit Farms":26ktd74m said:I agree with what both of you are saying. But the fact is the dogs owner should be at least 50% at fault also. Without his negligence those dogs would be alive today.
That's true but way too logical for our court system. They are lucky to convict actual criminals... much less divide up neglegence.
That's my problem with shooting dogs on sight... most of the time it'd not the dogs fault.