Reaching genetic potential

tapeworm":2n9hoh5z said:
Frankie: " We want big bulls to sell, but that also translates into bigger heifers and the milk EPD in the Angus breed has gotten too high, IMO. It's a balancing act."

Thank you for saying that frankie. All this chasing bigger and bigger numbers is increasing the size of our cowherd Im afraid..at some point we ahve to stop

The bottome line is that it just dont matter how big the expected numbers are if we cant afford to feed the cows or if we cantget calves on the ground..theres ALWAYS sacrifices made in other areas by focusing to much on some traits. Chasing bigger and bigger numbers is not alwasy the answer...we have to be sure that we never lose site of the efficent fertile cow
WE HAVE TO BE SURE THAT WE NEVER LOSE SITE OF THE EFFICENT FERTILE COW!!

Well said for cantankerous old stirrer
 
I totally agree with Frankie (you better - she's our expert on EPD's).
I did want to point out that there IS a baseline year that each breed uses for EPD's. Each breed has their own baseline year.
I'm not sure if it's still this way, but I know years ago, none of your data entered the system unless there was a "reference sire" used within the contemporary group. Don't think it's that way anymore. Used to be that you had to have at least 5 in a contempory group (same sex, same %, within an age range) now you only need 2. (in Simmental breed)
 
Jeanne - Simme Valley":3h36ox66 said:
I totally agree with Frankie (you better - she's our expert on EPD's).
I did want to point out that there IS a baseline year that each breed uses for EPD's. Each breed has their own baseline year.
I'm not sure if it's still this way, but I know years ago, none of your data entered the system unless there was a "reference sire" used within the contemporary group. Don't think it's that way anymore. Used to be that you had to have at least 5 in a contempory group (same sex, same %, within an age range) now you only need 2. (in Simmental breed)

:lol: :lol:

Yeah Frankie may be annoying at times but I danged sure would never get nto an argument with her on EPD's. I would take a heck of a whuppin'! Too smart for me.

:lol:

Bez!
 
I'll sure argue with her. I am too stupid to know that she is too smart. EPD's don't work as expected. Period.
 
ollie'":2jaruobl said:
I'll sure argue with her. I am too stupid to know that she is too smart. EPD's don't work as expected. Period.

On the arguing - forget it she is too danged tenacious - stubborn and thick headed. :lol:

As for epd's - well, you and I have always agreed on this subject!

My best,

Bez!
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I'm so glad to see that Bez! and Ollie' woke up in a good mood this morning. :P

EPDs do work as "expected."
 
Frankie":3lam66vt said:
I'm so glad to see that Bez! and Ollie' woke up in a good mood this morning. :P

EPDs do work as "expected."
Anymore I am just glad I wake up. If my calve are weighing 650 currently at weaning and I want to try to increase that weight a mere 10 lbs , what epd should I look for Frankie ? My current bull is a +50 ww.with acc. of .45. I hope you had a Merry Christmas btw. Did you eat the fruit cake I sent you or did you think it was a relative of yours??? :lol:One thing frankie, don't forget to figure in the genetic variability (you can use an average) for bulls. I certainly dont want a bull that gets me 20 500 lb calves and 10 850 lb calves. Also figure in the predictability of getting 10 lbs bigger calves please out of my herd. Not some herd in North Dakota.
 
Frankie":27592w6x said:
I'm so glad to see that Bez! and Ollie' woke up in a good mood this morning. :P

EPDs do work as "expected."

Wondered where you were. Hope your Christmas went well.

No comments on the epd's - other than you are as usual - wrong - I am not in the mood for a fight today. :lol:

You can even have the last word if you want!!!!!

Back atchya' :P



Bez!
 
For you gusy that say epds dont work..do you have any proof that they dont or is it just your opinion??or do you just not want to change the way you select bulls?? There seems to be a lot of research and money that says they work..is there as much info that says they dont?? Its just 1 more tool to me..I need all the help I can get LOL
 
I am actually a firm beleiver they work as they are supposed to work. They are just real limited in scope and range and are (in my opinion) of secondary value when buying seedstock.
 
More pointedly you can have a hundred cows with the top epd's of any respective breed and have nearly the worst set of cows within that breed. They can have wonderful epd's yet lack functionality, predictability , and uniformity.
 
Hello ollie..I can agree with most of that. Just 1 more tool to help select..but still cull based on phenotype
 

Latest posts

Back
Top