Stocker Steve
Well-known member
What would a typical % open be for first calf heifers?
Stocker Steve":1lsuhthu said:What would a typical % open be for first calf heifers?
TexasBred":rru07bh5 said:With my wife doing the breeding I'd expect 100%. The same for natural service as long as you had enough good fertile agressive bulls.
AI is more effective than ANY bull if you know what your doing.Aero":3su3fjic said:TexasBred":3su3fjic said:With my wife doing the breeding I'd expect 100%. The same for natural service as long as you had enough good fertile agressive bulls.
you really believe AI can be as effective as any old random bull?
Stocker Steve":1vonkoft said:What would a typical % open be for first calf heifers?
EAT BEEF said:Are you asking about virgin heifers or heifers breeding back after their first calf?
.quote]
We average about 85% in 45 days with 650# virgin heifers. We don't do repo scoring... The non breeders were some of the fleshier ones - - I think a couple got too fat on our improved pastures. Have you seen this?
My question is on breeding back after the first calf.
Stocker Steve":5005btk6 said:EAT BEEF":5005btk6 said:Are you asking about virgin heifers or heifers breeding back after their first calf?
.quote]
We average about 85% in 45 days with virgin heifers. I think a couple got too fat on our improved pastures. Have you seen this?
My question is on breeding back after the first calf.
[/quote]dun":3v9h66z2 said:My question is on breeding back after the first calf.
Stocker Steve":3izrtsm9 said:dun":3izrtsm9 said:My question is on breeding back after the first calf.
novaman":2y2p7mae said:AI is more effective than ANY bull if you know what your doing.
Aero":fza9vss5 said:TexasBred":fza9vss5 said:With my wife doing the breeding I'd expect 100%. The same for natural service as long as you had enough good fertile agressive bulls.
you really believe AI can be as effective as any old random bull?
Aero":2ew3ls9y said:novaman":2ew3ls9y said:AI is more effective than ANY bull if you know what your doing.
i think that comment just shot any credence of previous or future statements.
Your right TB. I should have said many. I do firmly believe that AI is more effective though. Aero you obviously don't feel the same and that's your choice. I have no problems with my "bulls" being infertile as every straw I pull from the tank is good, viable semen. While more work than NS, I watch my cows for heat constantly and catch anestrous cows during breeding season rather than at preg check months down the road. I can use genetics that far exceed anything I can get in a NS bull. There are probably other aspects that make it more effective that I can't think of right now. The point is NS is less labor intensive, but you can pay dearly for such a convenience. One bull going bad during a breeding season will cost you thousands.TexasBred":312a2xas said:Aero":312a2xas said:novaman":312a2xas said:AI is more effective than ANY bull if you know what your doing.
i think that comment just shot any credence of previous or future statements.
I'd only change one letter in the comment to make it move precise and that would be to change ANY to MANY. Amazing how many people think they are good at AI'ing and how many vets think they are the best at palpating. The vet can get by with it....if you do your own AI'ing time will catch up with you and you're fooling nobody but yourself.....but as I posted above IF you really are good you can outdo the bull, breed to better bulls and get it done in one service. If AI doesn't work for you then find the reason... don't condemn the concept.
novaman":1s0zcc3r said:There are probably other aspects that make it more effective that I can't think of right now. The point is NS is less labor intensive,
EAT BEEF":ivyxc12z said:How much better do you think A.I. bulls are? I have owned two bulls that have gone on to be used rather heavy A.I.,I didn't give over $4,000 for either one.I most be stupid but I thought they were just bulls.IMO just as many cow herds have been hurt by A.I. as have been helped.