• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

More on E Coli

dun

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
47,334
Reaction score
1
Location
MO Ozarks
Cattle production systems does not affect E. coli prevalence



(8/24/2009)


A new study suggests that when compared to conventionally raised beef cattle, organic and natural production systems do not impact antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli O157:H7. This discovery emphasizes that although popular for their suggested health benefit, little is actually known about the effects of organic and natural beef production on foodborne pathogens. The researchers from Kansas State University detail their findings in the August 2009 issue of the journal Applied & Environmental Microbiology.

Increased outbreaks of foodborne illness, as well as the growing awareness and popularity of organic and natural foods, have forced many cattle farmers to adopt new production methods to meet consumer demand for safe and healthy beef. Organic food sources receive only certified organic feed, are raised without the use of antibiotics, hormones and other veterinary products, and are regulated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Natural production guidelines completely restrict the use of antibiotics and hormones but do allow non-organic food sources and are only regulated by the brand name owner.

Cattle are major reservoirs of E. coli O157:H7 and their feces are the main source of food and water contamination that lead to foodborne illness in humans. In the study, fecal samples were collected from organically and naturally raised cattle and tested for the presence of E. coli O157:H7. Results showed prevalence rates of 14.8% in organically raised and 14.2% in naturally raised cattle. These E. coli O157:H7 levels were comparable to those previously identified in conventionally raised cattle, the researchers said. Additionally, the minimum inhibitory concentration of a variety of antibiotics for E. coli O157:H7 isolates were analyzed to determine the effects of all three production systems and no significant difference in antibiotic susceptibility was noted.

"The prevalences of E. coli O157:H7 that we observed in organically and naturally raised beef cattle were similar to the previously reported prevalence in conventionally raised cattle," the researchers said. "No major differences in antibiotic susceptibility patterns among the isolates were observed."

The article citation is S. Reinstein, J.T. Fox, X. Shi, M.J. Alam, D.G. Renter and T.G. Nagaraja. 2009. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in organically and naturally raised beef cattle. Applied & Environmental Microbiology 75(16):5421-5423.
 

Running Arrow Bill

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
3,439
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas Panhandle On US 83
Good information Dun!

Other side of the story:

It is well known that if people cook their meat properly (e.g., well-done for ground meat), wash their hands before handling food in the kitchen, as well as wash hands BETWEEN handling produce, and different species of meats, and observe accepted practices for avoiding cross-contamination, we would not have the serious E.Coli problem in the kitchen. HEAT kills E.Coli.

Just because vegetables and other produce "looks" clean at the supermarket doesn't in any way mean it isn't contaminated. People don't always thoroughly wash these items before use.

Fish and seafood as well as poultry are huge carriers of nasty bugs also. If people don't handle these items properly, well...hello food-borne illness.

We cannot assume that food in the stores is free of contamination, no matter how "fresh" it looks or how "cleanly" packaged the food it.

Just wonder how many people wash/rinse their hands between handling raw meats, produce, and cheese??? And...those people that let their small kids "help" in the kitchen!
 

Latest posts

Top