HOW TO USE EPDs

Help Support CattleToday:

icandoit

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
496
Reaction score
7
Location
Tx
Heres an example of how to use and read EPD's. I know that the list isn't complete, so if anyone else has something to add, feel free. I tried to put a couple of charts on here but I couldn't make them turn out right. Maybe someone can enlighten me on how to put charts in these posts.

Dick

HOW TO USE EPDs

EPDs are useful tools when planning breeding programs. Attention should be paid to the heritability and correlations of the traits a breeder wants to improve upon within the herd. Some traits are more heritable than others resulting in swift progress being made in comparison to other less heritable traits. Also, many traits are correlated meaning that the expression of one trait is related to the expression of another trait. The correlation between traits can be either positive or negative and close attention should be paid to these relationships, when developing selection criteria in a breeding program.

Understanding the heritability and the effects of correlation between traits will aid in developing a genetic selection program that will optimize improvement on desired traits while minimizing undesirable side effects.

How To Use EPDs in Sire Selection

Each individual breeder must set his own selection goals, based on the needs of his operation, the situation for that trait in his herd, and his production environment.

It would be easier if we could assume that the highest EPDs are the best. Unfortunately, it isn't that simple. Like most decisions, using EPDs for sire selection involves tradeoffs. For example, bulls with high growth EPDs may sire calves with a higher birth weight as well. And there may be other impacts on your operation to consider.

For example, when breeding heifers it is desirable to produce calves with lower birth weighs, so a breeder may want to pay special attention to birth weight EPDs of prospective bulls. If all calves were sold as feeders, the milk EPD would generally not rate much attention. Yearling weight will be important if you want to ensure finished steers in the appropriate weight range.

It should also be kept in mind that reaction to selection can differ from trait to trait. This is because some traits have higher heritability than others, and are more easily passed to offspring. For instance growth traits such as weaning weight respond faster to selection, than reproductive traits such as age at first calving.

A balance of traits is required, and the perfect balance for you will depend on your climatic, nutritional and economic environment, as well as the management goals you have set for your herd.

One way to select for several traits are to set minimum and maximum acceptable levels for each trait, and then choose sires that meet criteria. Another method would be rank all sires, on each trait, then develop a weighted index which ranks each bull from one (most desirable) to five for each trait. The bull with the lowest total score would be your first choice.

Producer 1 is looking for a sire that can be used on heifers; he wants a bull that will produce low birth weights and he wants to keep some heifer calves as replacements. Growth performance is not his first priority. The sire that fits his needs is sire D. He has a low birth weight EPD and above-average milk EPD.

Producer 2 has a sound-breeding program; he is looking for a sire that will maintain performance and milking ability. He will select a bull that will increase growth performance and milk while maintaining calving ease. Sire B is his choice.

Producer 3 has a herd of above-average-frame cows and is not planning on keeping heifers as replacements. She is looking for a bull that will give her the most profit at weaning. Sire A will give her the best result in weaning weight. If heifers are kept as replacements, they will, on average, be inferior for maternal milk.

Producer 4 wants to maintain his calving performance and growth performance but would like tom increase the milking ability in his females. Sire C is his choice.


How To Read EPDs:

EPD's are a measure of the expected differences in performance of a sire's/dam's progeny when compared to the average progeny of all sires/dams evaluated within the same breed. This prediction is based on actual performance, progeny performance and relatives' performance.

The Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) of all the cattle on this site are listed beneath the pedigree information. These values are expressed in plus (+) or minus (-) units of measure for the trait. For example, birth weight (BW), weaning weight (WW) and yearling weight (YW) EPDs are given in plus or minus pounds. Maternal Milk (MILK) EPD's are expressed as pounds of weaning weight.

Angus Carcass EPDs are used to give breeders the EPDs necessary to select for directional change in body composition (percent retail product) and/or quality (marbling) in progeny carcasses.

ACCURACY (Acc): The reliability that can be placed on an EPD. The amount of change expected will be decreased the closer the Acc. is to 1.0.

BIRTH WEIGHT (BW): The birth weights of a bull's/cow's progeny when compared to the breed average, in pounds.

YEARLING WEIGHT (YW): The adjusted yearling weights of a bull's/cow's progeny when compared to the breed average, in pounds.

WEANING WEIIGHT (WW): The adjusted weaning weights of a bull's/cow's progeny when compared to the breed average, in pounds.

SCROTAL CIRCUMFERENCE (SC): The adjusted yearling scrotal circumferences of a bull's/cow's progeny when compared to the breed average, in centimeters.

MILK: A measure of the amount of pre-weaning performance gained by calves which can be attributed to the milking ability of a bull's/cow's daughters. The EPD is expressed in pounds of calf.

CARCASS WEIGHT (CW): carcass weight is a good predictor of total retail product. In general, carcass weight is not a good predictor of percent retail product. Selecting sires/dams with the higher EPD for carcass weight will result in progeny carcasses that produce more total retail product at constant fat and age end points. An industry target weight range for carcasses would be between 650 and 850 pounds. As with any trait, you need to be cautious of selecting for extremes unless these are necessary for you program.

MARBLING SCORE (MB): The marbling score EPD can be used to select sires/dams that will produce progeny with more marbling at a constant fat and age end point. The higher the marbling score EPD, the higher the amount of intramuscular fat in the ribeye. It should be noted that the genetic correlation between the marbling score and external backfat at the 12th rib is nearly zero. This means that breeders can select for increased, external fat when taking animals to an age-constant end point.

RIBEYE AREA (REA): The cross-sectional area of the longissimus dorsi muscle (ribeye area) at the 12th rib has been shown to account for a significant amount of variation in percent retail product at a constant carcass weight end point. This means that given two sires/dams with the higher EPD for ribeye area will have progeny that yield higher percentages of retail product. Do not use the ratio of ribeye area EPD to carcass weight EPD as a selection index nor as an indicator of differences in percent retail product or muscling.

FAT THICKNESS (FAT): the 12th rib fat thickness heritablility has been estimated to be .25 traits, from the Angus carcass database.

PERCENT RETAIL PRODUCT (%RP): This EPD is expressed in percent, combining traditional carcass traitshot carcass weight, fat thickness, ribeye area and kidney-pelvic-heart fat. The formula for percent retail product is heavily influenced by fat thickness.
Additional facts to remember about EPDs are:
EPDs are the best overall prediction of progeny performance and are useful tools that aid in selection.

EPDs can be used to compare bulls/cows from different herds.

EPDs cannot be used to compare bulls/cows of different breeds.

EPD's on non-parent bulls/cows allow valid comparisons before progeny records are available.

EPDs on non-parents are calculated using pedigree information and individual records, if available.

A pedigree estimated EPD (PE) is the average of two parental EPD values (½ sire, ½ dam)
 
It would be easier if we could assume that the highest EPDs are the best. Unfortunately, it isn't that simple. Like most decisions, using EPDs for sire selection involves tradeoffs. For example, bulls with high growth EPDs may sire calves with a higher birth weight as well. And there may be other impacts on your operation to consider.

Dick, I have been giving EPDs a lot of thought recently and have read the article(s). What I'm struggling with is the statement above. I certainly comprehend the statement and realize the practicality of the current situation. But, I want my cake and be able to eat it too! In other words, I do not want to have to accept those tradeoffs. So from a breed enhancing successive breeding program, should I not be making decisions that will minimize or eliminate those tradeoffs (i.e. low birth weight with high growth)?

Thanks!
 
Conagher":1q8odrw3 said:
It would be easier if we could assume that the highest EPDs are the best. Unfortunately, it isn't that simple. Like most decisions, using EPDs for sire selection involves tradeoffs. For example, bulls with high growth EPDs may sire calves with a higher birth weight as well. And there may be other impacts on your operation to consider.

Dick, I have been giving EPDs a lot of thought recently and have read the article(s). What I'm struggling with is the statement above. I certainly comprehend the statement and realize the practicality of the current situation. But, I want my cake and be able to eat it too! In other words, I do not want to have to accept those tradeoffs. So from a breed enhancing successive breeding program, should I not be making decisions that will minimize or eliminate those tradeoffs (i.e. low birth weight with high growth)?

Thanks!

All high or low extremes have a trade-off. There are a few, very few, bulls that can do it all. The problem is that what is doing it all for me is totally different then for someone else. In a strictly terminal breeding, high WW and YW would be a good choice, unless your marketing program is slotted towards quality grade rather then yield grade. In that case, which is where we fall, moderate weights, early finish and high quality grades pay us premiums.
That's why you need to first address your market, then you can determine what is "best" for your situation

dun
 
dun, when I grow up, I wanna be just like you! :)

I thought this posting explained it better than any magazine article or postings made here when considering the epd's and how to use them:

dun said
If you really want to open this can of worms, here goes:

Bulls are a relatively simple deal for us since we do all AI. We use meat bulls and heifer maker bulls.
Meat bulls have to have low BW/high calving ease, moderate WW and YW, high REA and IMF and low backfat. Moderate WW/YW for us is no lower then the breed average and more then around 10-15% over. Our forage base won;t support cows with the high milk that's required to but the extra weight on those exceptionally high WW calves. Without creep it's strictly up to genetics, the cow and pasture to do the job.
More heifer makers the BW, WW, and YW plus calving ease and maternal calving, everything else is basically the same as heifers.

Replacements is another story. We won;t retain from our herd any heifers that we wouldn;t be willing to buy. But that's another issue.
When buying heifers that have EPDs if there is a large selection (multiple hundreds) we use loading factors but I can;t find the spread sheet and since we don;t attend those kinds of sales anymore so for us it's kind of academic.
Heifers have to be no more then 10% over the breed average for actual BW and must have an EPD no greater then the breed average. Calving ease and maternal calving ease EPDs haveto be above breed average, milk no more then 10% over breed average, stayabliity at or above breed average and carcass no more then 10% below breed average for any trait. If pelvic measurements are available a minimum of 168 and no more then 185.
Then disposition and finally comes the physical appraisal, height, feet and legs, top line, width and length, heart girth and barrel.
One thing that we've never been concerned with before but has reared it's ugly head this year is how they were developed and to a lesser degree what type of pasture, i.e. fescue, prairie grass, whatever they were raised on.
For any of the breeds that we would buy or retain there are other breed oriented factors.
That all said, this year I bought a heifer that I didn;t want because my wife fell for the pretty face.

dun
 
BIRTH WEIGHT (BW): The birth weights of a bull's/cow's progeny when compared to the breed average, in pounds.

YEARLING WEIGHT (YW): The adjusted yearling weights of a bull's/cow's progeny when compared to the breed average, in pounds.

WEANING WEIIGHT (WW): The adjusted weaning weights of a bull's/cow's progeny when compared to the breed average, in pounds

icandoit, I'd be interested in the site this information was copied from? Will you post it? Thanks.

But, these traits are not "compared to the breed average", they are compared to 0. IMO, you can and should compare them to breed average if you're not in a position to compare two animal's EPDs. EPD averages change with every sire summary, 0 stays the same, year after year. "Average" EPDs for Angus are BW 2.4 and YW 68. We've added 68 lbs of YW but only 2.4 lbs of BW since the base was set at 0.
 
But, these traits are not "compared to the breed average", they are compared to 0. IMO, you can and should compare them to breed average if you're not in a position to compare two animal's EPDs. EPD averages change with every sire summary, 0 stays the same, year after year. "Average" EPDs for Angus are BW 2.4 and YW 68. We've added 68 lbs of YW but only 2.4 lbs of BW since the base was set at 0.

If you don't compare them to breed average you wouldn't know where you stood TODAY!

Why would I compare the EPD's of a bull today,to the EPD's in, say, 1980? That one of the reasons for the percentile rating chart.
 
icandoit":1xzp41ot said:
I posted this information for the people that were kind of confused about EPD's. The article is by no means a blueprint on how you should choose cattle. Here is the link that I got the info. from.

http://www.southshadow.homestead.com/EPDs.html

Dick

icandoit, that's a good website and, overall, a good informative article. Some people tend to get confused with 'average' EPDs and '0' EPDs. EPDs are best used to compare two or more animals that you're considering using, but if you're only looking at one bull, it's good to compare him to the 'average' of his breed. Thank you for the link.
 

Latest posts

Top