Feral Hogs (long post)

Help Support CattleToday:

milesvb

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 1, 2004
Messages
991
Reaction score
0
Location
Central, TX, 60 mi. E of Austin
Excerpt from text: "Also troubling is the transmission of swine brucellosis to cattle, which has occurred at least 17 times since January 2006. Swine brucellosis in cattle is not of concern in the cattle brucellosis program, because swine brucellosis is not transmitted from cow to cow. However, it will cause infected cattle to test positive on brucellosis tests at the livestock market and at the laboratory. While laboratory confirmation is underway, the cattle herd must be held and tested, creating an inconvenience for the rancher and plenty of concern for the TAHC. If the infection is identified as swine brucellosis, the herd is released, and it's back to business as usual."

News Release
Texas Animal Health Commission
Box l2966 * Austin, Texas 78711 * (800) 550-8242 * FAX (512) 719-0719
Bob Hillman, DVM * Executive Director
For info, contact Carla Everett, information officer, at
1-800-550-8242,
ext. 710, or [email protected]

For immediate release---

Swine Health Issues Concern Producers and Regulators

According to fable, three little pigs built houses of brick, wood or straw to protect themselves against the wolf. Swine producers now work with pen design, housing construction and biosecurity measures to protect pigs against another wolf: wild (feral) hogs that can carry and transmit disease. And, there's no shortage of the wild pigs in Texas. Of the nearly 3 million swine in the state, more than two million are wild.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services in Texas
submitted samples from nearly 700 wild swine from August 2003 through May 2007. Test results showed that more than 20 percent, or 142 of 697 pigs had pseudorabies, a highly contagious viral disease that can cause mild flu-like signs in sows and boars, or kill piglets. About 10 percent, or 66 of 676 of the feral hogs were positive for swine brucellosis, a bacterial infection that can cause sows to abort. Swine brucellosis also may be transmitted from infected pigs to handlers.

The USDA, in its Program Standards for Pseudorabies Eradication, has classified swine based on how well their housing protects against wild hogs. "Commercial" swine, says the USDA, have the greatest protection and are maintained under high levels of biosecurity.

"Transitional" swine live in pens or on farms where it is conceivable that feral swine could burrow under, climb over, or go through fencing to commingle with the domestic pigs. Captured feral swine also can be included in the "transitional" swine herd. The USDA's third classification is for "feral" swine--pigs running free.

Since 2004, all "commercial" swine herds in the U.S. have been officially free of pseudorabies. USDA regulations allow commercial and transitional swine to move interstate without pseudorabies test requirements. While individual states may establish their entry requirements, these must meet, and may exceed, the USDA's Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) standards.

The USDA has not applied the three classifications of pigs in the national swine brucellosis eradication program. Texas is the only state not officially swine brucellosis-free.

To protect against potential disease introduction, the Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) requires incoming breeding swine six months and older to be test-negative for swine brucellosis within 30 days prior to entry. The animals also must be vaccinated within the previous 30 days with a Leptospirosis vaccine containing the Canicola, Hardjo, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Grippotyphosa, and Pomona strains.

The USDA also stipulates that swine moved across any state lines be identified with ear notches, an ear tag or a number tattoo, and travel with a certificate of veterinary inspection issued within the previous 30 days. The swine must not have been fed waste food or been exposed to hog cholera or pseudorabies, or vaccinated for pseudorabies.

The TAHC allows feral swine to be imported from other states, directly to slaughter, provided the pigs are transported in sealed trucks and accompanied by a VS 1-27 permit (a USDA document that can be issued by a USDA or state animal health official).

Swine Health Problems in Texas

In a recent meeting with the Swine Health Committee of the Texas Pork Producer's Association, TAHC veterinarians recapped Texas statistics from January 2003 through May 2007. Forty "transitional" swine operations had been quarantined at one time or another, due to pseudorabies or swine brucellosis infection. Of the 40 operations, both diseases were detected in nine herds, and two had repeated infection.

A dozen of the 40 operations had definite contact with feral swine, while 14 were reported to have had "possible" contact. The remaining herd owners said there was no contact with feral swine. However, the TAHC said feral swine can transmit disease to domestic pigs. When these diseased or exposed domestic swine are moved, they start the disease cycle again. This is referred to as "feral-related" infection.

In the report to the Swine Health Committee, the TAHC "zeroed in" on infection for 2006 and 2007, reviewing with the committee the testing and epidemiology conducted to confirm the source and/or spread of infection. In 2006, 13 Texas "transitional" herds were found to have pseudorabies. In 2007, six infected herds have been found, as of late July. Fifteen Texas "transitional" herds had swine brucellosis in 2006, with one detected so far in 2007.

Also troubling is the transmission of swine brucellosis to cattle, which has occurred at least 17 times since January 2006. Swine brucellosis in cattle is not of concern in the cattle brucellosis program, because swine brucellosis is not transmitted from cow to cow. However, it will cause infected cattle to test positive on brucellosis tests at the livestock market and at the laboratory. While laboratory confirmation is underway, the cattle herd must be held and tested, creating an inconvenience for the rancher and plenty of concern for the TAHC. If the infection is identified as swine brucellosis, the herd is released, and it's back to business as usual.

Pseudorabies or swine brucellosis can be detected through "first-point" or livestock marketing testing, required by the TAHC for sows and boars changing hands. In 2006, blood samples were collected from more than 4,000 swine at the market, and forwarded to the State-Federal Laboratory for testing. The change of ownership testing for breeding swine six months of age or older also applies to private treaty sales.

Testing of sows and boars slaughtered in Texas accounted for another 2,156 tests. Feeder pigs are not test-eligible, although they are moved frequently among small herds, and can play a role in disease transmission, reported the TAHC.

When infection is detected, the TAHC tests the swine in the herd of origin. If infection is confirmed, the herd owner is encouraged to have the swine depopulated. Federal indemnity funds, at market value, are available to pay the owner for domestic swine, but not for feral hogs. Prior to restocking, the owner's pens and facilities must be disinfected, to prevent the reintroduction of disease.

Disease surveillance is also conducted with "high-risk" herds, which include about 325 Texas-permitted waste food feeders, which are tested every two years. Since 2001, the feeding of meat scraps has been prohibited, due to the risk of disease transmission. Texas' USDA field staff inspects the waste food feeding operations routinely to ensure that only allowable productsfruit, breads, and vegetablesare provided to the swine. The TAHC meets with these and other owners of "transitional" swine herds, and has conducted more than 1,400 swine surveys in 2007. From these, about 50 high-risk herds were identified for testing, and infection was detected in two herds.

The most difficult and time-consuming aspect of disease surveillance and eradication is the epidemiological investigation. This work involves finding out where, when and how owners obtained or sold swine that my have been infected with or exposed to disease. The investigation will lead to additional herds that must be tested, and if more infection is found, the epidemiological work begins again. Sometimes, reported the TAHC, the schematic of the epidemiology will begin to look like a giant spider web, as animals are purchased, sold, moved and traded from herd to herd.

Conclusions: Helping Herds Avoid Disease

During the most recent legislative session, the TAHC was provided authority to regulate feral swine for animal health issues. For several years, the TAHC has approved the placement of the 75 or so TAHC-permitted feral swine holding pens and has allowed the captured wild hogs to go only to slaughter. Furthermore, rules have been in place requiring the testing of feral swine captured for transport locations other than slaughter, such as a hunting preserve.

To address feral swine health issues, the TAHC will establish a working group with the swine, hunting, and trapping industries to formulate more practical, effective, and enforceable regulations that protect swine production, while also benefiting the hunting industry.

At the same, should new entry and intrastate movement requirements be considered? Furthermore, the term "transitional" swine may be too broad, because it lumps together high-quality show pig and production farms with all backyard operations and waste food-feeding complexes. An additional term may be needed for small herds that are not "commercial," but are well managed and have swine health safeguards. More than 150 Texas "transitional" herds shipped swine interstate in 2006, and no infection was detected in pre-movement testing of animals.

Other measures to protect swine health?
1. Keep feral swine OUT.
2. Improve traceability of domestic swine to help animal health
officials conduct thorough and complete epidemiological investigations.
3. Ensure that swine entering your herd have tested negative for pseudorabies and swine brucellosis.
4. Keep new additions separate from the rest of the herd for at least 30 days.
5. Don't borrow boars, unless they have been tested.
6. Consider enrolling in the pseudorabies or swine brucellosis
certification programs. About 70 Texas herds currently are enrolled and have herds tested on a routine basis. It's a good marketing tool, particularly if you sell swine interstate.
7. If you have sudden widespread illness or unusual death losses in your herd, or see blisters or sores on your swine, immediately call your private veterinary practitioner and/or the TAHC at 800-550-8242.
 
You want to know what the kicker of the whole deal is...

Wild Hogs cause so many problems but yet the govt. keeps putting more,,, and more restriction on ways to control the wild hog population.

Where is the logic in that.... :x

All the anti-s are happy but every one else is paying the price. Why... because anti-s donate more $$$ than the agriculture and hunting groups. PETA :heart: TAHC
 
Not here. We have no season no limit and no restrictions. They'll even let you hunt at night with a simple permit. Sounds like your legislators are nor informed enough or just funded more by PETA that the hunters!
 
I just got back from a ferel hog hunt. Didn't need any type of license or permit, just the land owners permission. No limit or restriction on method of hunting. You can pretty much kill them as the opportunity arises. You can't break the law to do it though. You can't stop on the highway and shoot into someone's property or shoot one on the road, but otherwise, there really aren't any restrictions.
 
YOU DO NEED A HUNTING LICENSE TO HUNT HOGS IN TEXAS.
WILD HOGS ARE CONSIDERED EXOTICS..... NOT NONGAME ANIMALS.

GWs in Texas will bust you for that. We have to have licenses to hunt them with dogs also.

I shoot, trap, dog, ect.. hogs here on over 200,000 acres along with guiding. During grains season I run dogs some times 7 or 8 times a week and it gets harder and harder every year.

They have started putting a bunch of restrictions on the way you can transport hogs that have been trapped becuase of the witch hunt that TAHC and PETA have started.

Dogs are in their sights right now... soon that will be illegal and that is the most effective way to controll hogs.

That is just the start of it... inform YOURSELVES. The time is coming. PETA is on a rampage and they have the money to do it. Unless hunters ban together we are all about to loose our right to hunt any animal.

They are already sticking their hands in the cattle business and trying to tell us what is humane or not. The time is coming for that also.
 
You have to have a valid hunting license to hunt hogs. But it's a open season with no bag or possession limits. Kill as many as you wish. I killed 4 in one day last year..... the buzzards had a feast!
 
TexLonghornRanch":13zqrfwn said:
You have to have a valid hunting license to hunt hogs.

State law says that you do not need a license to hunt hogs on your own property or family property, if I understand it correctly, or if you're acting as "landowner's agent". You will need a hunting license otherwise and I don't know of anyone who hunts hogs that doesn't hunt other stuff too so not having a hunting license shouldn't be much of a problem for most folks. This regulation is stated in the annual publication put out by TP&WD.

If I remember correctly, this piece of legislation was introduced when a landowner pitched a fit to his state rep. after a gamewarden ticketed his kid for hunting hogs on their property without a license.
 
That is a very grey area.

If you are not the land owner then you need it for sure... and if you are a land owner and are shooting them under a deer feeder you better have it... but if you are shooting them from out of your corn field then you don't need it.

In our local area the GW has said they want ALL people hunting hogs need licieses,,, land owners or not,,, and they do inforce that.

It is way cheaper to buy the hunting license than to try and fight a ticket from a GW. :shock:
 
That is a very grey area.

If you are not the land owner then you need it for sure... and if you are a land owner and are shooting them under a deer feeder you better have it... but if you are shooting them from out of your corn field then you might be ok.

In our local area the GW has said they want ALL people hunting hogs need licieses,,, land owners or not,,, and they do inforce that.

It is way cheaper to buy the hunting license than to try and fight a ticket from a GW. :shock:
 
Brute 23":2ebz56qq said:
In our local area the GW has said they want ALL people hunting hogs need licieses,,, land owners or not,,, and they do inforce that.

Somebody needs to make a complaint to TP&WD. Law enforcement's job is to enforce existing law and not create their own. We have a zealous and strict but fair game warden here. He knows very well the problems that hogs are causing and has been very supportive of our efforts. If a game warden is issuing tickets for a legal activity then he needs to be removed from the job.
 
milesvb":huzji91n said:
Brute 23":huzji91n said:
In our local area the GW has said they want ALL people hunting hogs need licieses,,, land owners or not,,, and they do inforce that.

Somebody needs to make a complaint to TP&WD. Law enforcement's job is to enforce existing law and not create their own. We have a zealous and strict but fair game warden here. He knows very well the problems that hogs are causing and has been very supportive of our efforts. If a game warden is issuing tickets for a legal activity then he needs to be removed from the job.

:clap: :nod:
 
I agree... but it makes no difference. Its a catch 22. Your dammed if you do... your dammed if you don't.

If you call the people above him and complain... they tell him... he follows you around and eventually will get you for something.

If he gives you a ticket you will spend thousands of dollars trying to get it over turned.

I don't blame him... the GW is actually a very nice guy.

He gave a land owner a warning one time that was riding with us hunting.

The land owner made some smart comment and the GW told him I could give you the ticket any ways and then you could try to fight it if you would like... or you could not buy beer the next three times you go hunting. Then you could use that money for a license and you wouldn't have to worry about me. :lol:

He made a good point. A hunting license is all of $25 or something. :)
 
Brute 23":5uwzy5b8 said:
I agree... but it makes no difference. Its a catch 22. Your dammed if you do... your dammed if you don't.

If you call the people above him and complain... they tell him... he follows you around and eventually will get you for something.

If he gives you a ticket you will spend thousands of dollars trying to get it over turned.

I don't blame him... the GW is actually a very nice guy.

He gave a land owner a warning one time that was riding with us hunting.

The land owner made some smart comment and the GW told him I could give you the ticket any ways and then you could try to fight it if you would like... or you could not buy beer the next three times you go hunting. Then you could use that money for a license and you wouldn't have to worry about me. :lol:

He made a good point. A hunting license is all of $25 or something. :)

Yup. Some cops are like that too. It doesn't cost them anything to write a ticket. It costs us to fight it. System is not right.

Walt
 
The guys here in my office (all hunters) say they've never needed a license for hunting hogs. We don't have a problem on our property (yet) but everyone I know of that's had a problem hunted them or had someone else hunt them without a license.

That's no mistake about PETA.. they are one of the wealthiest non-profit organizations in the world. That and the Humane Society. I wish they would use their influence and money to protect homeless and unwanted KIDS instead of worry about animals.
 

Latest posts

Top