Mark Reynolds
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 30, 2023
- Messages
- 851
- Reaction score
- 1,037
Spoken like someone who has been through the mill of government programs requiring specifics exact enough to construct the space shuttle yet being impacted by every drop of moisture (drought/flood) every gust of wind (wind erosion), every degree of temperature every day of the year, every weight change in an animal and every change in forage type and height and soil type change. LOLPeople buy based on EPDs and then question the validity of EPDs. There is little middle ground. I used them as comparatives more than absolutes. But if a bull is supposed to sire bigger calves (weaning and yearling) with more growth and larger mature size and high milk production in daughters - he is terminal compared to other bulls that are more moderate. He is also not going to leave a good legacy in a herd that grazes fescue and has no to very minimal supplements. The most screwball EPD for Angus is the MM. It is milk plus whatever else that does not compute into the other EPDs. Some heads ought to roll until a mathematician can be located to make that correction. To be so promoted in the breed as "the gospel" you think that they would get their stuff to be the most applicable.
Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk and cut with a chain saw.